General Politics Thread

IMG_5092.jpeg

A lack of disrespect? Dare I ask what Mr. Smith thinks Starmer should have done to the portrait of Thatcher? I have a few ideas. Seriously though, since when have politicians been expected to venerate their political opponents? What next, “Farage accused of lack of respect for Lenin?”
 
Absolutely sick of hearing about this winter fuel allowance lark, even sicker to see that most of the people against means testing it are those I would normally consider myself politically aligned with. If I were Starmer, I would stand up and publicly say: "Why are you ostensibly 'left-wing' MPs complaining about the Labour Party not giving free money to people who already have enough money? Why are you okay with giving £300 of taxpayers' money to millionaires just because they're old?" I would probably add an emphatic "F*ck THAT" but I'm not suggesting he does, though I would be overjoyed it he did.

For reference, even a pensioner on the lowest state pension is eligible for pension credit which means they receive at the very least £120 more every damn week than a basic Universal Credit claimant below pension age. If people on UC are expected to make ends meet on £100 a week then pensioners damn well can on £220. AND they can still get housing and disability benefits on top of that if they need them. Forget all this talk of young people being wastrels who don't know how to budget, what the hell are old people spending all their money on that they're living in poverty on damn near a grand a month?
 
My parents always donated their winter fuel allowance to charity because they said it was ridiculous they received it when they are comfortable (and have renewables heating their home anyway)

The papers are screaming that the government are taking it away completely when in fact people who need it will still receive it.

Bit naiive of those in power to think £300 will be enough to cover the heating bills for the whole winter though 😬 those gas and electric bills cost a pretty penny these days
 
The papers are screaming that the government are taking it away completely when in fact people who need it will still receive it.

Thank you, I thought perhaps I was going mad here, I don’t think I have seen anyone in the media point this out, people on pension credit will still get it which is to say, the poorest pensioners who might actually need it. I was within an inch of becoming one of those people who writes letters to newspapers.

“You have women who think that truly the liberationist path is to spend 90 hours a week working in a cubicle at McKinsey instead of starting a family and having children.”

Vance added: “What they don’t realize – and I think some of them do eventually realize that, thank God – is that that is actually a path to misery. And the path to happiness and to fulfilment is something that these institutions are telling people not to do.

“The corruption is it puts people on a career pipeline that causes them to chase things that will make them miserable and unhappy,” Vance said. “And so they get in positions of power and then they project that misery and unhappiness on the rest of society.”

JD Vance, so tantalisingly close to realising a major problem with American society hardly any politician will ever talk about, but stumbling at the last hurdle and blaming the wrong “-ism”. Hint: All of what you have said is just as true for men as it is for women. The “-ism” you’re looking for is the one that encourages people to chase shallow material gain as the answer to their unhappiness and lack of fulfilment. This “-ism” is the reason men, women and children alike were working actual 90hr weeks in factories back in the 19th Century. Got it yet? No? Extra hint: That final paragraph describes your pal Donald to a T. Quick! Get him told, it’s not too late for him to forsake his golden penthouse and quest for power and spend the rest of his days sipping diet Cokes on a porch somewhere in the midwest with his family, at peace with the world.
 
Thank you, I thought perhaps I was going mad here, I don’t think I have seen anyone in the media point this out, people on pension credit will still get it which is to say, the poorest pensioners who might actually need it. I was within an inch of becoming one of those people who writes letters to newspapers.

JD Vance, so tantalisingly close to realising a major problem with American society hardly any politician will ever talk about, but stumbling at the last hurdle and blaming the wrong “-ism”. Hint: All of what you have said is just as true for men as it is for women. The “-ism” you’re looking for is the one that encourages people to chase shallow material gain as the answer to their unhappiness and lack of fulfilment. This “-ism” is the reason men, women and children alike were working actual 90hr weeks in factories back in the 19th Century. Got it yet? No? Extra hint: That final paragraph describes your pal Donald to a T. Quick! Get him told, it’s not too late for him to forsake his golden penthouse and quest for power and spend the rest of his days sipping diet Cokes on a porch somewhere in the midwest with his family, at peace with the world.

Confuscianism? 🤔

I get your point, but at the same time some people genuinely don't want -and likely cannot safely have- children, such as me. I honestly cannot emphasise how much the thought of wiping asses and cleaning up vomit makes me want to throw up myself, and people like Vance don't really view me as human, or deserving of rights. It's a weird place to be as an auDHD person stuck between people who think all women should be forced to bear children and people who think I shouldn't be allowed to have kids even if I did genuinely want them 😅 Regarding winter fuel allowance, I think given the mercilessness of the current benefits system some of those in need will fall through the cracks, but I also agree that some old people are actually rich and don't need it - I think the call for the level of income you need to have to not receive it to be increased is good, and speaking as someone younger with disabilities - specialised foods are not always cheap, and I don't think a grand a month is actually all that much even if you get your rent paid on top of that.

I also wish there was more acknowledgment that there's a whole world of existence outside of "shallow material things" and "kids" like, I like children and I want having them to be affordable, and tbh I also like material things, though it's not like I think that having vast quantities of them is the entire point of life, and I do care about the environmental and human rights impacts... but surely there's more out there than children and pretty dresses? If I'm honest though, I'm not really in the "experiences are more important than things" camp and I resent being told that being a decent person means denying who I am like that... like I'm a bit sick of seeing smug thin YouTubers who go travelling all the time expressing this kind of sentiment for one thing. I want my cute clothes to stay cute, so I don't have any kids or pets... my choice and I'm far happier for it tbh.
 
Last edited:
I agree that benefits like the winter fuel allowance should be means tested. Public money should go to those who need it most, of course.

However, I do find it laughable that only in May of this year, Mr. Starmer was criticising the Tories for considering implementing the very same winter fuel policy.

A good policy should be a good policy regardless of who is proposing it. Now you've got the current opposition (the Tories) criticising Labour for implementing the policy that they themselves considered and drafted up! It's one big merry-go-round between the conservatives and labour, and they're taking us all for fools.

Meet the new boss, same as the old boss - comes to mind.

View attachment ssstwitter.com_1726581959205.mp4
 
I'm with Radfem on this. Means testing will inevitably mean deserving people fall through the cracks and end up missing out on support they'd otherwise be getting, and that's a shame. Rather than claw back a bit of money this way at the expense of some people in need, the government could just tax the well off a little more and get it that way and no one in need would be adversely impacted. But anyway Starmer's labour being hypocritical and pro-austerity is hardly a surprise. It's interesting that the media are already starting to turn against Starmer though, the stories of his proclivity for lavish gifts and freebies have been out there for ages now and were completely ignored by the mainstream media during the election but now they've decided to start laying into him.
 
I'm with Radfem on this. Means testing will inevitably mean deserving people fall through the cracks and end up missing out on support they'd otherwise be getting, and that's a shame. Rather than claw back a bit of money this way at the expense of some people in need, the government could just tax the well off a little more and get it that way and no one in need would be adversely impacted. But anyway Starmer's labour being hypocritical and pro-austerity is hardly a surprise. It's interesting that the media are already starting to turn against Starmer though, the stories of his proclivity for lavish gifts and freebies have been out there for ages now and were completely ignored by the mainstream media during the election but now they've decided to start laying into him.

Agreed and I'd also add that means testing means bureaucracy which costs money from the public purse too. I agree with @ayase that the meanness of the current system to younger claimants in particular is morally reprehensible,
 
I'd like to know who is involved in means testing. As it really should include a wide range of people from a wide range of backgrounds. A lot of rules get put in place by people who have no experience of living at the bottom rung (or below it). TBH I am not elderly (although the hot water bottle on my back suggests otherwise) but I could do with a winter fuel allowance! Am currently on UC and unemployed through no fault of my own, and I don't get enough each month to pay the summer bills, this winter is going to be all blankets and hot water bottles again like last year.
 
I think there's a perfectly reasonable argument to be made for doing away with means testing completely along with the state pension, universal credit and any other benefits and instituting a UBI, which if memory serves has even been calculated to work out cheaper than the current system anyway due to there being no reason for the DWP to even exist any more. And everyone would get it so no-one could complain about unfairness.

Until we reach that point however, I agree with all benefits being means tested. As previously pointed out, pensioners already get more than double the standard rate of UC every week. They get that friggin' triple lock which makes sure their income rises in line with inflation, which is not the case for others reliant on benefits nor even for the employed. There's a lot of talk about people who are ostensibly eligible for pension credit but haven't applied for it and perhaps there are some who don't understand the application process or are "too proud" to ask for help (that seems to be the media's new favourite phrase) but do they deserve no questions asked free money because of their own failings? Such charitable thinking is not extended to the unemployed or disabled below pension age. If someone below pension age is "too proud" or stubborn or lacking in knowledge to go to the JobCentre, they don't get any benefits either. The point of means testing is that it establishes limits and enforces them, it's not a case of who is examining people's finances, someone either meets the criteria or they don't. If anyone at the DWP awarded someone benefits who wasn't entitled to them or worse, refused someone who was eligible, they'd probably be fired if not have a lawsuit on their hands.

The current moaning about the winter fuel payment reminds me of nothing so much as Emperor Palpatine cowering in the corner going "I'm too weak" while he gets ready to force pull UNLIMITED MONEY!!! out of the government coffers the moment they back down, which to be fair they will be doing next year anyway when the triple lock puts an extra £460 in every pensioner's pocket. Again, unlike anyone else in society. As far as I'm concerned they can get means tested like everybody else or they can get bent. I still really want to know how someone can fail to survive on £220 a week (that's before housing and disability benefits, remember. People who need help with housing costs have those added on top of this as do people who require help with the extra costs of their disabilities). Where does that go? Seriously, if there's jobs going for means testing pensioners I'll do it, I want to see their budgets. Martin Lewis they are clearly not. You don't need to be 30p Lee to suggest someone can survive on 30 quid a day.
 
To be honest the majority of my money goes on making sure my kids have a decent time in their lives, food, petrol and bills. I spend a LOT on music lessons and taking them to museums etc to make sure they get enough extra-curricular output. It is hard on just UC and quite often I get paid on the last day of the month and by 4th of the following month my bank is texting to say I'm overdrawn, and I won't have even gone food shopping yet. Every time I see my parents I get an envelope pressed into my hand with cash for petrol and shopping or my mum buys the kids school clothes, it's bloody ridiculous, I'm in my flippin' forties, I should be able to provide for my family. I am a single parent but the dad does chip in too. He never has any money either though he does work.
I accept I'm never going to be rich and I have no desire to be (although if someone fancies dropping a cool mil in my lap I'm not going to turn them away! But I will use it for good...) but this is ridiculous. I spent all last winter shivering over my laptop doing my college work, wrapped up in blankets and with a hot water bottle and not using my oven at all because expensive, and yelling at the kids for leaving lights on. I couldn't work for quite a while because my brain was broken and the DWP said I may get some additional payment for that, but it went up by £30 a month. Woo flippin hoo. I'm not expecting the tax payer to be responsible for me to live it up, just live a little without spending each day panicking, raiding the kids saving account to put petrol in my car (Yes I do ask them first)
This is what it's like being on UC. I've been applying for jobs for quite some time now because I can't afford to be seriously mentally ill, it turns out. And prior to redundancy I worked for 29 years, I'm definitely not a dole scav.
 
To be honest the majority of my money goes on making sure my kids have a decent time in their lives, food, petrol and bills. I spend a LOT on music lessons and taking them to museums etc to make sure they get enough extra-curricular output. It is hard on just UC and quite often I get paid on the last day of the month and by 4th of the following month my bank is texting to say I'm overdrawn, and I won't have even gone food shopping yet. Every time I see my parents I get an envelope pressed into my hand with cash for petrol and shopping or my mum buys the kids school clothes, it's bloody ridiculous, I'm in my flippin' forties, I should be able to provide for my family. I am a single parent but the dad does chip in too. He never has any money either though he does work.
I accept I'm never going to be rich and I have no desire to be (although if someone fancies dropping a cool mil in my lap I'm not going to turn them away! But I will use it for good...) but this is ridiculous. I spent all last winter shivering over my laptop doing my college work, wrapped up in blankets and with a hot water bottle and not using my oven at all because expensive, and yelling at the kids for leaving lights on. I couldn't work for quite a while because my brain was broken and the DWP said I may get some additional payment for that, but it went up by £30 a month. Woo flippin hoo. I'm not expecting the tax payer to be responsible for me to live it up, just live a little without spending each day panicking, raiding the kids saving account to put petrol in my car (Yes I do ask them first)
This is what it's like being on UC. I've been applying for jobs for quite some time now because I can't afford to be seriously mentally ill, it turns out. And prior to redundancy I worked for 29 years, I'm definitely not a dole scav.

I'm really sorry you're dealing with all that... I've never worked a paid job cuz of my disabilities (and a lot of them are in the "hidden/invisible" or "complex needs" camp so I'm pretty sure a lot of people assume I'm just lying or exaggerating which just makes me feel even worse) and I'm pretty upset by all this cuz my benefits per payment cycle are a fair bit higher than what is being said by certain posters to be an acceptable amount for someone to live on, I know I'm not the most responsible person with my money but I do actually need some spare to afford things that aren't just my routine food bills and stuff (like say if my bed broke or I needed a new mattress, for example) and I have as much need and right to save money for a rainy day and indulge myself every now and then, as any abled person does. Honestly the system is so broken in so many ways, I've wanted to sell my art to make a living but don't dare cuz if I tried and it went badly I'd prob lose what I rely on now and how is that fair or right? I really feel for you, mental illness is one of the most difficult things and I really wish you and all your family all the best. I'd also like to add (as a general point not directed at you) that regarding mental illness therapy doesn't help everyone and some people are just left more traumatised by it particularly if they are neurodivergent for example (not the only reason but I know that one well as a neurodivergent person myself), I'm all for therapy being accessible to everyone but I really do not feel safe or comfortable with it and that's not stubborness or some sort of not wanting to work thing :(

EDIT: I did actually volunteer for Amnesty bookshop for a few years when I was much younger but I felt like I wasn't being enough of a help in the end so I left :(
 
Last edited:
I'm really sorry you're dealing with all that... I've never worked a paid job cuz of my disabilities (and a lot of them are in the "hidden/invisible" or "complex needs" camp so I'm pretty sure a lot of people assume I'm just lying or exaggerating which just makes me feel even worse) and I'm pretty upset by all this cuz my benefits per payment cycle are a fair bit higher than what is being said by certain posters to be an acceptable amount for someone to live on, I know I'm not the most responsible person with my money but I do actually need some spare to afford things that aren't just my routine food bills and stuff (like say if my bed broke or I needed a new mattress, for example) and I have as much need and right to save money for a rainy day and indulge myself every now and then, as any abled person does. Honestly the system is so broken in so many ways, I've wanted to sell my art to make a living but don't dare cuz if I tried and it went badly I'd prob lose what I rely on now and how is that fair or right? I really feel for you, mental illness is one of the most difficult things and I really wish you and all your family all the best. I'd also like to add (as a general point not directed at you) that regarding mental illness therapy doesn't help everyone and some people are just left more traumatised by it particularly if they are neurodivergent for example (not the only reason but I know that one well as a neurodivergent person myself), I'm all for therapy being accessible to everyone but I really do not feel safe or comfortable with it and that's not stubborness or some sort of not wanting to work thing :(

EDIT: I did actually volunteer for Amnesty bookshop for a few years when I was much younger but I felt like I wasn't being enough of a help in the end so I left :(
I completely hear you on the therapy thing. The only thing offered to me was Talking Space and that did not help at all. The CBT does not work for anxiety at all (or my type of anxiety anyway, if there are 'types') and when I completed the course I said very diplomatically to the doctor that it didn't really help and they had no interest in listening to peoples' issues, just telling them how to not spiral and ignoring the queries asking 'what if we are already spiralling?!' Doctor said that they had literally no more to offer unless I wanted to go privately and get a psychiatrist. Hilarious. And pay for it with what exactly...
The system is broken. I bloody hope this new government hammer funds towards MH services.
I'm so sorry RadFem for any grief you have gotten over your disabilities because boy there are a lot of people out there with judgmental fingers pointing 'well if they can drive/walk/move they can work' etc.

And for what it's worth I think your art is lovely!
 
Right, here's the deal, to make things absolutely clear: None of my comments have been directed generally at people on benefits. In fact, none of my comments have been directed at people on benefits at all because those in receipt of pension credit are still eligible for the winter fuel payment. I am one of your number currently, as much as I hate being desperately poor I must hate employment slightly more and it appears the DWP agree I currently should not be working in case I snap and murder somebody. However I am (probably rightly) not classed as disabled so I receive only the basic amount of UC. So while we're relating personal experiences, here's how I spend my £98 a week (minus housing costs because remember, housing benefit is a separate benefit for both UC claimants and for pensioners):

Half of the bills in shared accommodation, monthly cost divided by 4 for weekly cost:
Council tax: 65/4 = £16.25
Gas/Electric: 60/4 = £15
Water: 20/4 = £5
Internet: 15/4 = £3.75

Total: £40.00 a week (or £5.72 per day)

Personal costs, monthly cost divided by 4 for weekly cost:
Food: 160/4 = £40
Mobile Phone: 10/4 = £2.50

Total: £42.50 a week (or £6.07 per day)

Average total cost of living: £82.50 a week (or £11.79 per day)

The remaining £15 or thereabouts goes on the odd DVD or book or pair of jeans or shoes, lest I lose the will to live entirely. Now let's say to make things simple, I didn't share my house and had to pay all the utility costs myself, so that £40 a week becomes £80 and the personal costs stay the same, thus my costs would be £122.50 a week (or £17.50 a day). What I am taking issue with here is pensioners not on pension credit who have an income above £218 a week (or £31.15 a day) pleading poverty. This is what I am failing to understand and nobody anywhere, least of all the media, seems willing or able to explain to me. If someone, anyone, could enlighten me as to what is causing a non-disabled pensioner (because disabled pensioners can get PIP) to need to spend £100 a week more than I do, I would be satisfied. I could pay my rent as well without even needing housing benefit on £218 a week.
 
Last edited:
Very touchy subject, but I won't say much as I'll probably get banned for having an opinion
But, there are people out there who take the p*ss those, and I agree there are alot that genuinely need the help, but the government don't care, which is the whole point, you have people, mainly teens, who have been taught to not work and play the system as the family have done,some of my family do it, and how they get away with it is beyond me, probably that's why I don't have much do with them as I voice my opinion on the matter
I have suffered from anxiety and depression since I was around 21 onwards, I take meds since then, even now I take them, I have tried all sorts and for me I know I'll be on them for life. Progabelin is so so so addictive and that's one i am on and another is mirtazipine, it's rough, I have good days and then I have severely terrible says where I want strangle everyone at work, I have look at the bigger picture on my good days, I have goals I want to achieve and try my damn hardest to stick to them, soon as I've paid my 35 years national insurance or my pension(why would i give this government anymore?) , I doubt I will work full time after that. since I started work at 16 I've been a saver, and even with my condition I've been out of work for 3 months at one time in the past 20 years I've been working, as i felt like hell, when I've reached 55, I want to escape this country and live abroad,I have always hated the way this country is, its so so corrupt!. tsoon as i had a huge deposit I put it towards an house,so my mortgage will be small and probably pay it of in the next 5 years or so, (I will be 40 then) it's an investment for when I reach that later stage in life, nearing the end towards pension age.
As for people moaning about pensioners getting this this this, there are a hell of a lot who have paid into the system for 40,50 and even 60 years, so don't you think they deserve that extra? I know I think they do as they will get nowhere near the money back in which they have paid in.
Life's a mystery and people suffer in different ways, i get that, but they should look at people backgrounds and say, hang on, why are 15,16, 17 years old nowadays finishing school and having kids so young, as lets be honest, they will never work a day in there lives, and then they expect handouts in as much as i get working 190 hours a month.
 
As for people moaning about pensioners getting this this this, there are a hell of a lot who have paid into the system for 40,50 and even 60 years, so don't you think they deserve that extra?
Frankly, no. The taxation and benefits system is there to fund help for people when they need help. It's not a savings account, you're not supposed to get back what you put in. My household pays £130 in council tax every month but we certainly don't receive £130 worth of services in return, that money goes towards things like the fire brigade helping people whose houses catch fire on the understanding that if our house was to catch fire we would get the same help. The same goes for the NHS, not everybody needs expensive treatment but if they do need it that's what taxes pay for. We could say everyone can pay for everything themselves but well, you only need to look at America with its $650 EpiPens (cost to the NHS from everyone's NI contributions: £53.80, cost to a UK citizen when they need one: zero) to see where that gets you. Their private health insurance and deductibles costs them a lot more than our NI contributions cost us.

You've also hit on something that I hear quite a lot which, without intending any offence here, I consider to be a bit of a contradiction. You ask why you would want to contribute to this society (which I don't entirely disagree with, at least not as long as people's tax money is going to fund weapons for foreign wars that are nothing to do with us, lucrative government contracts for politicians' chums or of course, the billions being poured into the pockets of private hoteliers to house refugees, which is no fault of the refugees themselves but of successive governments failing miserably to build any social housing that could be used to house them at a minute fraction of the current cost) but at the same time you're also being quite dismissive of people who actually go the whole hog and refuse to contribute. If you don't think society deserves people's contributions then the people who don't contribute to society are to be applauded for playing the system and only taking from it while giving it nothing, surely? If everybody did that the system would collapse completely; would that be a good thing or a bad thing? I'm not entirely sure of the answer to that myself.
 
Frankly, no. The taxation and benefits system is there to fund help for people when they need help. It's not a savings account, you're not supposed to get back what you put in. My household pays £130 in council tax every month but we certainly don't receive £130 worth of services in return, that money goes towards things like the fire brigade helping people whose houses catch fire on the understanding that if our house was to catch fire we would get the same help. The same goes for the NHS, not everybody needs expensive treatment but if they do need it that's what taxes pay for. We could say everyone can pay for everything themselves but well, you only need to look at America with its $650 EpiPens (cost to the NHS from everyone's NI contributions: £53.80, cost to a UK citizen when they need one: zero) to see where that gets you. Their private health insurance and deductibles costs them a lot more than our NI contributions cost us.

You've also hit on something that I hear quite a lot which, without intending any offence here, I consider to be a bit of a contradiction. You ask why you would want to contribute to this society (which I don't entirely disagree with, at least not as long as people's tax money is going to fund weapons for foreign wars that are nothing to do with us, lucrative government contracts for politicians' chums or of course, the billions being poured into the pockets of private hoteliers to house refugees, which is no fault of the refugees themselves but of successive governments failing miserably to build any social housing that could be used to house them at a minute fraction of the current cost) but at the same time you're also being quite dismissive of people who actually go the whole hog and refuse to contribute. If you don't think society deserves people's contributions then the people who don't contribute to society are to be applauded for playing the system and only taking from it while giving it nothing, surely? If everybody did that the system would collapse completely; would that be a good thing or a bad thing? I'm not entirely sure of the answer to that myself.
Again, how people see if differently I guess, people who dont work and have an "illness" mostly workshy lay abouts, get the same pension I get(state pension) as they get there ni stamped every year, again, they pay £0 in and they take out
The system is unfair for the worker, and i know about the "nhs" fees, I have nothing against "foreigners" my wife is a filipino, her last visa extension is next year, she came here in 2019,and the amount altogether it would of cost me for her to stay here is £10,000. £6000 is for "nhs surcharge" ontop of her working and paying her taxes ohhh I know how the system works, and in that time she has not once used the nhs, even for a Dr's visit even those we registerd her, she won't go,should I of paid the government £10 000 for the privelege of having my wife live and stay with me? Bear In mind I work a minimum paid job, always have done, bear in mind from next year, to bring a loved one here they raise the threshold to £38500 a year you need to be earning at minimum which is 3 or 4% of the population what they earn, you think that's fair aswell? I did mine at the right time and got her here as the gov don't want genuine people here they want flood us with illegals

And yes, if i could pay no taxes, I would just pay private for treatment, like i did for braces, like i do for dentist.

This is by no means digs at people at all, I've said all along the system is just so poor for the working person, I have no beef with people on benefits as alot do need them, the gov could easily sort the workshy out from the genuine people, but they don't, they rather hike taxes for the worker to pay for it so they don't have a job to do

In theory the taxes I pay i do class as a savings pot for when I retire, If moved abroad now, and I didn't tell the gov and stopped working I wouldnt get full pension, as I didn't tell them, they wouldn't magically give me full state pension, I would get the lowest level as I've paid more than 10 years, that it, so to me, it's a savings pot, I have to pay in, to take out

Nowadays it's every family for themselves, if i dont work, no one would help me, I would get no help at all. People may think it's selfish, but I disagree, it's just facts, im an honest person so wouldnt lie about a fake disability as it may come back one day to haunt them

On another note, how much did rishi dishi wife with a nom dom status pay in taxes while she should of paid ££millions in taxes? Don't you wonder why workers are so pi**ed off? And don't want to contribute?

Anyone here who thinks the gov is on there side need a serious look in the mirror, the hate everyone of us😂in it for themselves
 
Last edited:
should I of paid the government £10 000 for the privilege of having my wife live and stay with me? Bear In mind I work a minimum paid job
No Dave, while I have no real knowledge of the process that does seem like a ludicrous sum. And now someone in your situation wouldn't even be allowed to have their foreign spouse join them in the UK since they've instituted a minimum income of £29k to obtain a spouse visa. "You must be this wealthy to be with the person you love" is probably the most hateful restriction of people's freedom in this country in recent memory. Particularly bad, as you say, given that this rule was instituted by the government of our millionaire former PM with a billionaire foreign wife.

Regarding benefit fraud, I have to say I'm really not all that bothered if people are milking the system. I agree with your assessment that the system is basically all corrupt grifters anyway, so when Starmer's taking hundreds of thousands from lobbyists I don't really begrudge the bloke down the road hobbling about on crutches to get himself an extra few hundred quid before closing his curtains and doing some break-dancing. If you were to work cash in hand to avoid taxes I wouldn't begrudge you that either. If you can see that it's the people who play by the rules who get shafted, I think the logical response is to stop playing by the rules yourself (in Minecraft, of course).

I still think the best and fairest solution to all of the issues with the benefits system is a UBI but a lot of people still seem to be against giving people "money for nothing" ignoring the fact that a universal basic income would be universal, so everyone would get it including them and anything they earned would be extra. It seems to me what actually annoys people about the prospect of UBI is that other people are capable of or willing to live more frugally than they are, whereas they feel they would still need (want) to work in order to have more stuff. I guess that's probably what scares governments about UBI as well, since the entire global economy is built on encouraging people to work more so they can earn more so they will spend more and pay more in taxes. Nothing is more terrifying to a capitalist system than hearing people say "Actually, I don't need any more, I have enough" because it breaks their entire business model.

Oof. I wrote a lot here today, politicked out now I think.
 
I still think the best and fairest solution to all of the issues with the benefits system is a UBI but a lot of people still seem to be against giving people "money for nothing" ignoring the fact that a universal basic income would be universal, so everyone would get it including them and anything they earned would be extra. It seems to me what actually annoys people about the prospect of UBI is that other people are capable of or willing to live more frugally than they are, whereas they feel they would still need (want) to work in order to have more stuff. I guess that's probably what scares governments about UBI as well, since the entire global economy is built on encouraging people to work more so they can earn more so they will spend more and pay more in taxes. Nothing is more terrifying to a capitalist system than hearing people say "Actually, I don't need any more, I have enough" because it breaks their entire business model.

Oof. I wrote a lot here today, politicked out now I think.

If AI wipes out the white collar job sector the way they tell us it will, a UBI may be the only way that human civilisation as we know it will survive; the first step on the road to a Star Trek utopia.
 
While I get that the system is crap for the average working person, I really don't get where this idea comes from (well actually I probably do know, the media) that it's actually great for the average unemployed person, which I guess is what @Dave1988 seems to be saying. There are people in this thread on UC and other benefits, I don't know how you can read posts like the ones @Anj wrote and come and say things like "people who dont work and have an "illness" mostly workshy lay abouts". No, people who don't work and have an illness are not mostly workshy lay abouts. I know you weren't talking about anyone in this thread or trying to offend anyone, but you come across as insensitive to other people's hardships to say the least. You've clearly got your own hardships too and I don't doubt that, but you're not the only one mate. And I promise you that most of the chronically unemployed people out there would wish to be in the sort of position you are with a stable job they can hold down and a wife they were able to bring over from another country. You're coming in to this thread basically saying "poor me poor me, I'm so hard done by" but showing zero awareness or empathy for what other people in this thread are going through.

Of course there are a minority of people gaming the benefits system, but funnily enough the only ones I've known who do that are definitely not what you could call workshy, but people moonlighting about two different cash in hand jobs and multiple side hustles while also getting benefits. And like ayase, I don't really begrudge them, and I don't think they're really worth getting angry about. And as for the genuinely "workshy", who don't want to work and would rather subsist and get by on the meagre basic UC. Well, first of all that's a frugal life, and the DWP don't really make it easy to do this, I know this very well. I've been on UC and been genuinely ill so couldn't attend a work search review, I went to the doctor and got a sick note, and I still got sanctioned by some anonymous decision maker despite this. They're constantly trying to force you into some job you'd likely be terrible at and wouldn't last very long in. But that's nothing compared to what other people go through, so many genuinely deserving people in need or with children or with disabilities get shafted by the DWP. So honestly, you might want to talk to more people who actually receive benefits before you come to the conclusion that they're all wiping their bums with £50 notes and laughing at the honest working man. You're directing your anger at the wrong people. You correctly have a dim view of the current government and the establishment, cool I'm with you on that, but you've fallen right into their trap of getting angry about people who are weaker and worse off than you, the unemployed, illegal migrants, teenagers with no prospects, young struggling families, the ill.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top