The papers are screaming that the government are taking it away completely when in fact people who need it will still receive it.
“You have women who think that truly the liberationist path is to spend 90 hours a week working in a cubicle at McKinsey instead of starting a family and having children.”
Vance added: “What they don’t realize – and I think some of them do eventually realize that, thank God – is that that is actually a path to misery. And the path to happiness and to fulfilment is something that these institutions are telling people not to do.
“The corruption is it puts people on a career pipeline that causes them to chase things that will make them miserable and unhappy,” Vance said. “And so they get in positions of power and then they project that misery and unhappiness on the rest of society.”
Thank you, I thought perhaps I was going mad here, I don’t think I have seen anyone in the media point this out, people on pension credit will still get it which is to say, the poorest pensioners who might actually need it. I was within an inch of becoming one of those people who writes letters to newspapers.
JD Vance, so tantalisingly close to realising a major problem with American society hardly any politician will ever talk about, but stumbling at the last hurdle and blaming the wrong “-ism”. Hint: All of what you have said is just as true for men as it is for women. The “-ism” you’re looking for is the one that encourages people to chase shallow material gain as the answer to their unhappiness and lack of fulfilment. This “-ism” is the reason men, women and children alike were working actual 90hr weeks in factories back in the 19th Century. Got it yet? No? Extra hint: That final paragraph describes your pal Donald to a T. Quick! Get him told, it’s not too late for him to forsake his golden penthouse and quest for power and spend the rest of his days sipping diet Cokes on a porch somewhere in the midwest with his family, at peace with the world.
I'm with Radfem on this. Means testing will inevitably mean deserving people fall through the cracks and end up missing out on support they'd otherwise be getting, and that's a shame. Rather than claw back a bit of money this way at the expense of some people in need, the government could just tax the well off a little more and get it that way and no one in need would be adversely impacted. But anyway Starmer's labour being hypocritical and pro-austerity is hardly a surprise. It's interesting that the media are already starting to turn against Starmer though, the stories of his proclivity for lavish gifts and freebies have been out there for ages now and were completely ignored by the mainstream media during the election but now they've decided to start laying into him.
To be honest the majority of my money goes on making sure my kids have a decent time in their lives, food, petrol and bills. I spend a LOT on music lessons and taking them to museums etc to make sure they get enough extra-curricular output. It is hard on just UC and quite often I get paid on the last day of the month and by 4th of the following month my bank is texting to say I'm overdrawn, and I won't have even gone food shopping yet. Every time I see my parents I get an envelope pressed into my hand with cash for petrol and shopping or my mum buys the kids school clothes, it's bloody ridiculous, I'm in my flippin' forties, I should be able to provide for my family. I am a single parent but the dad does chip in too. He never has any money either though he does work.
I accept I'm never going to be rich and I have no desire to be (although if someone fancies dropping a cool mil in my lap I'm not going to turn them away! But I will use it for good...) but this is ridiculous. I spent all last winter shivering over my laptop doing my college work, wrapped up in blankets and with a hot water bottle and not using my oven at all because expensive, and yelling at the kids for leaving lights on. I couldn't work for quite a while because my brain was broken and the DWP said I may get some additional payment for that, but it went up by £30 a month. Woo flippin hoo. I'm not expecting the tax payer to be responsible for me to live it up, just live a little without spending each day panicking, raiding the kids saving account to put petrol in my car (Yes I do ask them first)
This is what it's like being on UC. I've been applying for jobs for quite some time now because I can't afford to be seriously mentally ill, it turns out. And prior to redundancy I worked for 29 years, I'm definitely not a dole scav.
I completely hear you on the therapy thing. The only thing offered to me was Talking Space and that did not help at all. The CBT does not work for anxiety at all (or my type of anxiety anyway, if there are 'types') and when I completed the course I said very diplomatically to the doctor that it didn't really help and they had no interest in listening to peoples' issues, just telling them how to not spiral and ignoring the queries asking 'what if we are already spiralling?!' Doctor said that they had literally no more to offer unless I wanted to go privately and get a psychiatrist. Hilarious. And pay for it with what exactly...I'm really sorry you're dealing with all that... I've never worked a paid job cuz of my disabilities (and a lot of them are in the "hidden/invisible" or "complex needs" camp so I'm pretty sure a lot of people assume I'm just lying or exaggerating which just makes me feel even worse) and I'm pretty upset by all this cuz my benefits per payment cycle are a fair bit higher than what is being said by certain posters to be an acceptable amount for someone to live on, I know I'm not the most responsible person with my money but I do actually need some spare to afford things that aren't just my routine food bills and stuff (like say if my bed broke or I needed a new mattress, for example) and I have as much need and right to save money for a rainy day and indulge myself every now and then, as any abled person does. Honestly the system is so broken in so many ways, I've wanted to sell my art to make a living but don't dare cuz if I tried and it went badly I'd prob lose what I rely on now and how is that fair or right? I really feel for you, mental illness is one of the most difficult things and I really wish you and all your family all the best. I'd also like to add (as a general point not directed at you) that regarding mental illness therapy doesn't help everyone and some people are just left more traumatised by it particularly if they are neurodivergent for example (not the only reason but I know that one well as a neurodivergent person myself), I'm all for therapy being accessible to everyone but I really do not feel safe or comfortable with it and that's not stubborness or some sort of not wanting to work thing
EDIT: I did actually volunteer for Amnesty bookshop for a few years when I was much younger but I felt like I wasn't being enough of a help in the end so I left
Frankly, no. The taxation and benefits system is there to fund help for people when they need help. It's not a savings account, you're not supposed to get back what you put in. My household pays £130 in council tax every month but we certainly don't receive £130 worth of services in return, that money goes towards things like the fire brigade helping people whose houses catch fire on the understanding that if our house was to catch fire we would get the same help. The same goes for the NHS, not everybody needs expensive treatment but if they do need it that's what taxes pay for. We could say everyone can pay for everything themselves but well, you only need to look at America with its $650 EpiPens (cost to the NHS from everyone's NI contributions: £53.80, cost to a UK citizen when they need one: zero) to see where that gets you. Their private health insurance and deductibles costs them a lot more than our NI contributions cost us.As for people moaning about pensioners getting this this this, there are a hell of a lot who have paid into the system for 40,50 and even 60 years, so don't you think they deserve that extra?
Again, how people see if differently I guess, people who dont work and have an "illness" mostly workshy lay abouts, get the same pension I get(state pension) as they get there ni stamped every year, again, they pay £0 in and they take outFrankly, no. The taxation and benefits system is there to fund help for people when they need help. It's not a savings account, you're not supposed to get back what you put in. My household pays £130 in council tax every month but we certainly don't receive £130 worth of services in return, that money goes towards things like the fire brigade helping people whose houses catch fire on the understanding that if our house was to catch fire we would get the same help. The same goes for the NHS, not everybody needs expensive treatment but if they do need it that's what taxes pay for. We could say everyone can pay for everything themselves but well, you only need to look at America with its $650 EpiPens (cost to the NHS from everyone's NI contributions: £53.80, cost to a UK citizen when they need one: zero) to see where that gets you. Their private health insurance and deductibles costs them a lot more than our NI contributions cost us.
You've also hit on something that I hear quite a lot which, without intending any offence here, I consider to be a bit of a contradiction. You ask why you would want to contribute to this society (which I don't entirely disagree with, at least not as long as people's tax money is going to fund weapons for foreign wars that are nothing to do with us, lucrative government contracts for politicians' chums or of course, the billions being poured into the pockets of private hoteliers to house refugees, which is no fault of the refugees themselves but of successive governments failing miserably to build any social housing that could be used to house them at a minute fraction of the current cost) but at the same time you're also being quite dismissive of people who actually go the whole hog and refuse to contribute. If you don't think society deserves people's contributions then the people who don't contribute to society are to be applauded for playing the system and only taking from it while giving it nothing, surely? If everybody did that the system would collapse completely; would that be a good thing or a bad thing? I'm not entirely sure of the answer to that myself.
No Dave, while I have no real knowledge of the process that does seem like a ludicrous sum. And now someone in your situation wouldn't even be allowed to have their foreign spouse join them in the UK since they've instituted a minimum income of £29k to obtain a spouse visa. "You must be this wealthy to be with the person you love" is probably the most hateful restriction of people's freedom in this country in recent memory. Particularly bad, as you say, given that this rule was instituted by the government of our millionaire former PM with a billionaire foreign wife.should I of paid the government £10 000 for the privilege of having my wife live and stay with me? Bear In mind I work a minimum paid job
I still think the best and fairest solution to all of the issues with the benefits system is a UBI but a lot of people still seem to be against giving people "money for nothing" ignoring the fact that a universal basic income would be universal, so everyone would get it including them and anything they earned would be extra. It seems to me what actually annoys people about the prospect of UBI is that other people are capable of or willing to live more frugally than they are, whereas they feel they would still need (want) to work in order to have more stuff. I guess that's probably what scares governments about UBI as well, since the entire global economy is built on encouraging people to work more so they can earn more so they will spend more and pay more in taxes. Nothing is more terrifying to a capitalist system than hearing people say "Actually, I don't need any more, I have enough" because it breaks their entire business model.
Oof. I wrote a lot here today, politicked out now I think.