CitizenGeek said:
I'm quite perplexed, Rui. Did you actually read what I wrote, or did you just project an absurd idea ("banning members based on arbitrary measures of quality") onto what I said? It's really quite difficult to have a proper discussion when you decide to assign opinions to me that I've never held and have certainly never expressed.
Of course we cannot ban members for being too young or too immature. But we can actively pursue a more mature base by removing the things that attract young and immature, annoying, repellent members. This thread is one of those things. The games forums is another.
I did read what you wrote. Although there is a huge difference between outright banning people and manipulating them to leave by taking away their fun in principle, in the end it has a similar effect. I confess that I find it difficult to understand how one topic and one forum category (which is currently barely used and under review as previously discussed) can so badly destroy your enjoyment of the threads on politics, news and of course, anime/manga.
I think your view is that the "fluffy" threads encourage people to be less serious about the other topics (I'd steer away from defining entire people as "fluffy" or immature because people grow and change too quickly, and even the most lighthearted person is capable of a serious post if they want to make one). That may be true, but I don't agree that that's necessarily a bad thing. A large portion of the site users like to socialise in these threads and talk about their hobbies in a more freeform, relaxed way, and people here are usually pretty good about keeping the fluff in the fluff topics and the interesting things in the others. I don't personally like to socialise much, so I rarely post in this topic. I remain unconvinced that destroying it will enrich the site, nor that it's inherently less interesting than topics about which non-anime items a person bought that day and the like.
The reason I eventually made an account here on AUKN was because of what the site is, not what I wanted it to be. Perhaps if the mods were stricter (or more relaxed, depending on which extreme was chosen) it would be a bigger forum, but it wouldn't be the forum I came to like.
If you would like to set up a strictly mature anime discussion website, I would probably join it as well as stay here. I am however not willing to steer this site and its users into something they don't want to be for the sake of growing; I believe that Chaos and Paul would both agree with that.
But the real world doesn't work that way. You can't target two groups of people who are so fundamentally different and are looking for two different benefits from forums. It just doesn't work that way.
I guess what we are targeting is not a question of mature or immature people. It's tolerant people, with perceived age (physical or mental) out of the equation. Amray and Otaku are now merrily chatting together. That's far more pleasing for me to see than a Utopian forum where every single topic is about something I'm personally interested in.
This is a niche hobby. I have to personally disagree that discouraging bouncy people from posting at all in to encourage more verbose people to join is a case where the potential benefits outweigh what would be lost.
Any further disagreements with me are more than welcome to find their way to my PM box where I will answer them. I do not wish to continue arguing in the lighthearted chitchat thread.
R