Buzz201
Mad Scientist
I don't want to clog up the thread more than I already have by replying the same thing to several different people. So this is intended as a reply to @Rui, @IncendiaryLemon and @serpentino Hopefully you guys can forgive the hugely obnoxious portion where I start telling somebody clearly more talented than me how to do their job.
I suppose the best way of describing it is that 1.11 is a superhero film, which ends after the very first battle with the henchmen, but before you even find out the bad guy's identity.
The whole idea behind storytelling can be massively simplified down to set up a conflict > send protagonist on a journey of some kind > use gains from journey to resolve conflict, and the conflict can be literal, physical, person or emotional. Eva 1.11 is the set up and a bit of the journey with none of the resolution. Obviously, it's a remake of a TV series, it was never going to be the full resolution, but from a storytelling perspective what you should probably do is break the series down into the main conflict > journey > resolution and several simultaneously running smaller conflict > journey > resolution elements. Then pay the smaller ones off, whilst working towards the main resolution, much in the same way arcs of a long-running shonen series do. At the end of the arc you get the resolution to that specific arc and then you get some element that contributes towards the journey part of the main conflict. The way, you still get a sense of resolution and pay off without feeling unsatisfied at the lack of progress in the main arc.
When I say it lacks a beginning, middle and end, what I really mean is that it lacks a narritive or character arc for Shinji within the specific film, and as a result it fails to function on a satisfying level as a standalone film. Even if it's part of a series, for me at least, films still need to function on a standalone level within the series. So in Harry Potter 4 (is it Goblet of Fire?) he may not kill Voldemort, but he does settle the mystery of who enters him into the competition and how he ended up there. So J.K. Rowling uses the smaller conflict arc of the games to makes us feel satisfied with the lack of resolution in the larger Voldemort arc. Part of the reason Harry Potter is so good is that J.K. Rowling does an excellent job of creating a hugely compelling sub-arc whilst also using that to feed into the journey portion of the main arc.
That said, despite my issues with the film. I don't wish it any ill will. I have questions over it's treatment, but it definitely deserves a nice CE and it definitely desrves to remain in print.
I suppose the best way of describing it is that 1.11 is a superhero film, which ends after the very first battle with the henchmen, but before you even find out the bad guy's identity.
The whole idea behind storytelling can be massively simplified down to set up a conflict > send protagonist on a journey of some kind > use gains from journey to resolve conflict, and the conflict can be literal, physical, person or emotional. Eva 1.11 is the set up and a bit of the journey with none of the resolution. Obviously, it's a remake of a TV series, it was never going to be the full resolution, but from a storytelling perspective what you should probably do is break the series down into the main conflict > journey > resolution and several simultaneously running smaller conflict > journey > resolution elements. Then pay the smaller ones off, whilst working towards the main resolution, much in the same way arcs of a long-running shonen series do. At the end of the arc you get the resolution to that specific arc and then you get some element that contributes towards the journey part of the main conflict. The way, you still get a sense of resolution and pay off without feeling unsatisfied at the lack of progress in the main arc.
When I say it lacks a beginning, middle and end, what I really mean is that it lacks a narritive or character arc for Shinji within the specific film, and as a result it fails to function on a satisfying level as a standalone film. Even if it's part of a series, for me at least, films still need to function on a standalone level within the series. So in Harry Potter 4 (is it Goblet of Fire?) he may not kill Voldemort, but he does settle the mystery of who enters him into the competition and how he ended up there. So J.K. Rowling uses the smaller conflict arc of the games to makes us feel satisfied with the lack of resolution in the larger Voldemort arc. Part of the reason Harry Potter is so good is that J.K. Rowling does an excellent job of creating a hugely compelling sub-arc whilst also using that to feed into the journey portion of the main arc.
That said, despite my issues with the film. I don't wish it any ill will. I have questions over it's treatment, but it definitely deserves a nice CE and it definitely desrves to remain in print.
Last edited: