vashdaman said:
...it could be said that your views overlap with certain spiritual lines of though albiet worded slightly different.
I love that line. Spiritual teachers tend to use slightly less profanity, don't they? But I approve of how you have me pegged as some kind of needlessly antagonistic philosopher. That's the image I try to cultivate.
@Sparrow - I'm pretty sure real love can go away as well. How would you deal with rejection otherwise? It can "become platonic love" sure, if a relationship comes to an end through mutual agreement in an amicable fashion. Unfortunately most don't. They end with one person still loving the other but the feeling no longer being reciprocated. Thus the love
has already gone away for one person, and the other has to stop loving as well (or become a stalker, whatever you think is healthier).
If you think we can only call a feeling which endures "love" you would have to wait until at least one party involved had died, then conclusively verify that they had never been unfaithful. Then, and only then, could what they had be declared "love". I think I'll stick to classifying love as something which can come to an end...
Edit: I have to agree with af17, this conversation is way too deep for this thread. Somebody split it off please.