CitizenGeek said:
Are you ever going to get over the fact that - gasp! - I'm a Final Fantasy fan? Believe it or not, but liking Final Fantasy is not a crime against humanity and does no disqualify from having a valid opinion on other games. I still don't understand why me liking Final Fantasy bothers you so much, but I suggest you stop being so shockingly childish and simple minded, build a bridge and get over it :] I'm pretty sure we were supposed to be talking about Resident Evil, but if you wish to veer off topic, so be it ....
I like how you read. I never actually associated you or
that game together in the same sentence. But I was just giving an example of an extremely hyped up game and there's nothing more hyped that it. But I can mention some others if you'd like, it's the Metal Gear Solid 2 of RE, the Street Fighter II of RE, the Fable of RE. Good enough?
CitizenGeek said:
Preferring the later games in the FF series makes me ignorant?
Obviously, or I wouldn't have said it.
CitizenGeek said:
Based on your wannabe 4chan nonsense, I'm assuming it's the latter.
First sign of insult. You're cracking.
CitizenGeek said:
Explaining why the story is bad doesn't make the story any better. Of course there's a reason the story is bad; there's a reason for everything. D'uh!
RE5 includes three survivors from the Arklay Mountain incident from the original game, one being the main villain. Of course the villains advance the story forward as without them there wouldn't really be a story now, would there? Wesker has been there since day one. As Leon said in RE4, "Saddler,
you're small time." being the generic throw away villain we can happily forget after one game. I believe the original villain would leave a stronger impression on the story than some guy who's in it for one game. Even though you know... both storys are fairly awful.
CitizenGeek said:
Regardless of whether Capcom care about geography or not, finding Aztec ruins in Africa is jarring and cripples immersion in the game for anyone with even a remedial understanding of history and geography. Resident Evil 4 resembled rural Spain, which immersed me in the setting and helped with the atmosphere and such.
Rural Spain was early in the game for RE4, early in the game for RE5 we had some African shanty towns. Mid-way in RE4 we have a grimdark European castle while we get tribesman in RE5, pretty sure it's quite accurate. The Aztec ruins in Africa is a bit of a stretch but the Resident Evil series in general is quite far fetched so complaining about it won't really get you anywhere.
CitizenGeek said:
You're defending RE5 vs. RE4 by saying RE4 is the one that deviates from the series? Seriously?
Yes it does without the change in RE4 the change wouldn't have occured with RE5, naturally.
Unrelated but any mod viewing this post I ask you to move our posts to the RE5 topic, since you know... the content in our posts are related to that topic and not this once. Thanks in advance.