MaxonTreik
Chuunibyou
Why are you complaining as if this is something new? Just learn to deal with it instead of moaning about how you don't understand why people do things differently, Princess.
ilmaestro said:How much more pleasant this page of this thread (I'm blithely assuming that everyone's forum settings mean that this exchange covers no more than a page) would have been if you had replied like that in the first place, or just said nothing at all.
Professor Irony said:AironicallyHuman said:City Hunter is the greatest anime ever created.
This. It is effectively the anime equivalent of the A-Team.
fabricatedlunatic said:It never ceases to amaze me how anime fans manage to find gay/lesbian subtext in even the most innocent of relationships. Anyway, seeing as Christmas is supposed to be 12 or something, I'd say it's a good thing. But then I don't have Sana on my favourite character list...
It's a good show. I'm surprised I was the first to write a Kurau/Witchblade recommendation on MAL, so similar are the themes shared by the two. With you liking Witchblade, I'm not surprised that Kurau is also up your street.
Rui said:This is why these rating threads always bother me, and why I can't get along with something like MAL. Liking anime is a very personal thing, but as soon as someone seriously rates something popularly regarded as "uncool" high, or heaven forbid, does the opposite, they're jumped on. Maybe it's enjoyable to bicker about arbitrary numbers but I don't see the appeal.
AironicallyHuman said:I'm ashamed of myself for not having watched City Hunter sooner; me being a huge GTO fanboy and all.
VivisQueen said:*adds 'City Hunter' to her wtw list*
At 51 eps, I might reserve it for the summer or something.
And being honest on my part, I was talking largely from my point of view, as I didn't think I'd been unpleasant at all, but perhaps I had also just read your initial posts the wrong way and you weren't trying to be unpleasant either. The point about the length of your post was more observational than opinionated - it was to illustate that I wasn't sure why you made such a blustery "can't be bothered to spend the energy" statement to begin with. I definitely wasn't saying it should have been a longer post, apologies if that was the impression given.VivisQueen said:ilmaestro said:How much more pleasant this page of this thread (I'm blithely assuming that everyone's forum settings mean that this exchange covers no more than a page) would have been if you had replied like that in the first place, or just said nothing at all.
To be honest, I didn't find this discussion particularly unpleasant. And neither sarcasm nor 300 word responses are uncharacteristic of anime discussion threads (come on, why pick on such petty aspects when there are juicy assertions of mine to pick apart?) and thus shouldn't have taken anything away from the debate. But oh well.
I actually did quite enjoy it too, haha. Just couldn't resist the comment. ^^;Professor Irony said:ilmaestro said:You mean the only way to improve it is to get Jackie Chan to star in it?
/may not have that quite right
Y'know, I actually thought the Jackie Chan version was okay. It doesn't bear much resemblance to the series it's supposedly an adaptation of (they even gave Kaori long hair for feck's sake), but it's still quite an entertaining little film in its own right.
Ghandi didn't earn the right to star in an eponymous movie by just "learning to deal with things". :-/Maxon said:Why are you complaining as if this is something new? Just learn to deal with it instead of moaning about how you don't understand why people do things differently, Princess.
ilmaestro said:...The point about the length of your post was more observational than opinionated - it was to illustate that I wasn't sure why you made such a blustery "can't be bothered to spend the energy" statement to begin with...
...Let's go back to the controversial subject of "the score" in an attempt to explain - you would give the series 7.5/10 (I could be slightly wrong there)? Right, well I don't give "half point" scores when I do bother with a rating out of 10, because that's turned it into a rating out of 19, and you're moving into increasingly murky waters. So let's assume I round half marks "up" in general. 9/10 for this series could be effectively 8.5/10, and then we're arguing about a series that we have a one "point" difference on (although, as mentioned before, I think our scales are probably pretty different, so whether it's really a smaller or larger difference is unclear)
Exactly. Although I would say we've actually managed to avoid that, and it was only the meta-discussion that reached that stage.VivisQueen said:But yeah, I think at this point our discussion's collapsing into pure number crunching.
Yeah, I can see that view. It's just a shame that in Season 1, Saji and Louise don't really do much story-wise. Heck, with this current rewatch, I'm finding the Human Reform League and Advanced European Union far more interesting than Celestial Being xDStuart-says-yes said:Focus on the AEU, HR ect, portray the side of the human army, and celestial being is used to show the series from the view of the "terrorists", well Saji and Louise are used to show the neutral view point, of a human who is aligned with neither opposing party, and how the actions of the army and the "terrorists" effect there lives.