Sy said:
All that glitters is Final Fantasy, right CG? Don't make me laugh.
Oh noes! I like Final Fantasy more than you! I
must be wrong, then! Don't make
me laugh, Sy.
It was a clever way of milking an already popular cash cow. Sure games are mainly action but FF is an RPG and has a substantial amount of storytelling to involve the player to back up the action like all RPG's should.
Hah, you're pointing out that FFVII was milked as though milking popular stuff never happens. I'm pretty sure most of the stuff you like is 'milked', too (Lupin III - 300+ episodes, 10+ movies, anyone?). Yes, Advent Children was a cash-in, but so is
every sequel and every spin-off either in games or anime.
A lot of the characters that turned up had no purpose being there and only said about one line each.
They showed to fight Bahamut-SIN .... or have you actually watched the movie? I don't know what you were expecting with Advent Children - you did know it was based on
Final Fantasy VII, right? You did know that there were
a good few characters in FFVII, yes?
Honestly, Sy, you're criticising AC for not achieving something it never intended to achieve. It's like bashing Gankutsuou for not being realistic, or bashing Detective Conan for failing as a sci-fi.
And yeah visuals and fight scenes are a big part of anime and no sin at all but only when they are backed by good characters, story and settings.
Yeah, Advent Children had all that - the characters and setting were developed in Final Fantasy VII. There was no need to re-hash all of that character development, was there?
Let me explain this in simpler terms: Advent Children = Videogame
sequel. Please consult a dictionary or something and familiarise yourself with the word 'sequel'.
If you want to go the fact it was a video game route then well so was Gungrave and look at that. The game was little more than a shoot em up with a vague storyline and they turned out a fantastic anime series.
Ah, now it's really obvious that you just don't understand what Advent Children is. The Gungrave anime was an
adaptation, AC is a
sequel. C'mon, Sy, the concept of a sequel isn't that difficult to work out.
Looking at it as a stand alone movie it can't be seen as anthing more than a cash in and looking at it as a sequel to the game it's even kind of insulting to the fans of the story in the original game.
But it's
not a stand-alone movie! If you want to watch it as such, fine - but don't complain that it didn't conform to stand-alone movie norms. What would you say to someone who watched End of Eva without watching the original series and complained that it didn't make any sense? Again I'm in awe of this stubborn confusion - it was a sequel, sequels are common, surely it can't be that hard to accept the fact that AC was a sequel.
Please don't talk for the fans of FFVII, either. As an FF fan, and somone who spends a lot of time talking with other FF fans, I know that the overwhelming majority adored FFVII :]