The .... How you find a girlfriend Thread
- Thread starter Armitage
- Start date
evangelion rocks
Vampire Ninja
Does man scully count?
Armitage said:
Since you replied I'm going to bite on this. If you make prejudiced claims like this you had better have the body of a Greek god and the brains to match it or women (and men) are going to pin you as an arrogant, bitter loser. I hope you were joking (or are in fact the most attractive man alive, in which case we'll forgive you).
If you're having trouble finding 20 year old girls with no child or obesity problem I must suggest that you are obviously looking in the wrong places.
R
Is out of here
Great Teacher
Armitage said:
Poor.
MaxonTreik
Chuunibyou
Not that I condone his attitude, but it's not as if he's wrong. The UK is one of the worst countries in the world for obesity and teen pregnancy.Rui said:
But anyway, as they say, there are plenty of fish in the sea.
Slicedbreadno2
Brigade Leader
yes plenty of FAT fish!
Is out of here
Great Teacher
Slicedbreadno2 said:
What im about to say is not aimed at you.
Who gives a **** if women are fat? seriously a woman is not about breasts, ass, and sex. I admit being a man I do think about sex its almost impossible for me not to do so. But if it came to having a relationship with someone, sex would be one of the last things on my mind.
EpicLulz said:
Simpley put. Most people dont find fat people attractive. I mean personally; I dont find fat people attractive. Sure I COULD have a good friendship with a fat person but; its just not attractive. Therefore; it would be hard to have a good relationship with her.
Thats my put on it; anyway.
Is out of here
Great Teacher
Kurogane said:
Indeedy, There are a few of us out there but not many.
MaxonTreik
Chuunibyou
You have to be physically attracted to someone as well as mentally attracted to have any type of relationship that is beyond being shallow. If you find them physically repulsive, you're not going to want to make love to them, which on the contrary, is actually very important.EpicLulz said:
Slicedbreadno2
Brigade Leader
Maxon said:
Indeed if were all honest its the looks we FIRST look for in any partner, its then the personality that holds the relantionship together. But you have to find the person attractive first otherwise why would you pursue them??
Is out of here
Great Teacher
There is 2 types in my book.
Passionate love - which involves continuously thinking about the loved one and also involves warm sexual feelings and powerful emotional reactions.
Companionate love - is having trusting and tender feelings for someone who is close to you.
Personally speaking I choose the second one. Tho let me make it clear I have no problem with people who choose the first one.
Can their be love without sex? yes, companionate love, where intimacy and commitment are present without any sexual passion.
Problem is
Passion and intimacy without commitment is Romantic love. When the passion fades, and the intimacy wanes, the relationship ends.
Passionate love - which involves continuously thinking about the loved one and also involves warm sexual feelings and powerful emotional reactions.
Companionate love - is having trusting and tender feelings for someone who is close to you.
Personally speaking I choose the second one. Tho let me make it clear I have no problem with people who choose the first one.
Can their be love without sex? yes, companionate love, where intimacy and commitment are present without any sexual passion.
Problem is
Passion and intimacy without commitment is Romantic love. When the passion fades, and the intimacy wanes, the relationship ends.
Is out of here
Great Teacher
Slicedbreadno2 said:
I have no problem with this comment, I guess im just one of these few strange people who sees is the other way round.
I find loving the personality enhances my appreciation of their looks. Not sure if it works the other way around for me but I wouldn't be surprised if it does for a lot of people as pretty people with vapid personalities still seem to get plenty of dates. Being a crazy woman though my sexual attraction is only ~30% based on physical traits anyway. The rest is a mix of their personality, attitude and probably those insidious pheromones 
I know some people dismiss entire groups of people as potential mates without saying a word to them for being too fat/thin/tall/short/dark/light/smart/stupid etc; I just find it amusing when single people who describe themselves as lonely do so so vehemently without necessarily being a particular prize themselves. There's nothing wrong with having high standards if there are reasons behind them but the more criteria you have the harder it is, so logic checking them for reasonableness occasionally is useful.
I'd never have dated say, a smoker - because I think it's disgusting and selfish. I know where some of you are coming from with logic like that.
R
I know some people dismiss entire groups of people as potential mates without saying a word to them for being too fat/thin/tall/short/dark/light/smart/stupid etc; I just find it amusing when single people who describe themselves as lonely do so so vehemently without necessarily being a particular prize themselves. There's nothing wrong with having high standards if there are reasons behind them but the more criteria you have the harder it is, so logic checking them for reasonableness occasionally is useful.
I'd never have dated say, a smoker - because I think it's disgusting and selfish. I know where some of you are coming from with logic like that.
R
Rui said:
I am not adonis. And i lived in many lands and GB is the worst in fat/teenage pregnant i have ever seen. I dont like fat and i dont want the child of other people. I think there is nothing wrong with it. I was not really looking till now. Only work/shopping and travel and one time a pub. Sometimes i see nice womans but they are rare. I live on the land not in Glasgow or Edinburgh i think thats not good in this case.