Sssh, it's not like I was out of the house all day yesterday.theirsbailiff said:
because a 3 disk BD won't sell.Joshawott said:Sssh, it's not like I was out of the house all day yesterday.theirsbailiff said:
Honestly though, I wonder if a 6-disc set will sell. Why not just do a 3-disc DVD set or a 3 disc BD set?
Reaper gI said:because a 3 disk BD won't sell.
This forces DVD buyers to subsidise the BD print run, that's the whole point of combined sets.
So in other words; Manga is as Manga does.MikeP said:I really have no idea what the hell they think they're doing sometimes. It seems that whoever is in charge of pricing at Manga has no appreciation for consumer psychology whatsoever.
The only goal they seem to have is making back most of the printing costs in first week sales.
ilmaestro said:You can see their thinking easily: Are there people out there who will buy the DVD set, but would have passed on the combi set due to the higher price? And are there some people out there who want a DVD version for any one of a number of reasons, but would also like to pay a little more so they can have the BDs too?
Whether they're right or not is a whole other question, but beyond anything except the most speculative guesswork on almost everyone else's part.
ilmaestro said:You can see their thinking easily: Are there people out there who will buy the DVD set, but would have passed on the combi set due to the higher price? And are there some people out there who want a DVD version for any one of a number of reasons, but would also like to pay a little more so they can have the BDs too?
Whether they're right or not is a whole other question, but beyond anything except the most speculative guesswork on almost everyone else's part.
MikeP said:If you're aiming to pick up consumers who want a DVD but might also want a Bluray then you should be pricing your DVD sets to make your combi pack appear attractive and reasonably priced. You shouldn't be pricing your DVD set only on production costs.
This is the way I would lean, too, but the specific numbers that people are throwing about seem very... risky? baseless? I can't think of a good word for it, but people (not singling you out, just replying to your post as it's relevant and I want to reply with my own speculation later when I've thought about it more ^^; ) talk with too much assumed authority on matters like this at times, imo.Rosencrantz said:I can see what they are thinking, but its the wrong call.
ilmaestro said:This is the way I would lean, too, but the specific numbers that people are throwing about seem very... risky? baseless? I can't think of a good word for it, but people (not singling you out, just replying to your post as it's relevant and I want to reply with my own speculation later when I've thought about it more ^^; ) talk with too much assumed authority on matters like this at times, imo.Rosencrantz said:I can see what they are thinking, but its the wrong call.
They have for me, though thier view IMHO would skyrocket if they would let someone who doesn't devolve into a screaming howler monkey whenever someone says "no" to him work their online presence.ilmaestro said:Yes, it's a shame Manga doesn't have someone to do what Andrew does for Kaze so well (although kudos to him for letting us know about as much stuff as he can as regards any facet of the industry here). Manga, for me, have not dropped into that Funimation level of "I want them to fail so that something better can be born in their place", it's true.
He did come on here once (or at least someone from Manga did) but it was a very short-lived affair. The fact that they seemed to take offence easily and left very soon after didn't exactly help their reputation around here.vashdaman said:Can we get Jerome on this forum? It would blow my mind.
Like all Manga ventures, he did it for five minutes then buggered off, cussing our free thinking ways as he vanished into the blackest night.vashdaman said:Can we get Jerome on this forum? It would blow my mind.