I think it's fairly obvious why Yuri On Ice swept the Crunchyroll Anime Awards with such significant leads in every category - because it's a recent, popular show with a very passionate, vocal fanbase and at the end of the day, these awards amount to little more than a popularity contest. However, I have to ask - is there actually anything wrong with that?
Frankly, I find it amazing that an anime has resonated with enough people to result in such a strong showing - even if the show personally isn't my cup of tea. While I would personally contest it winning Best Moment over Erased (that scene was so damn powerful and heart-breaking), I voted one way and the majority voted another - that's just how these things work.
While I dislike a lot of the sentiment surrounding Yuri On Ice's sweep though, I do feel that genuine concerns have been raised that should be addressed if Crunchyroll host a 2017 Awards. Namely, to avoid the practice or accusation of ballot-stuffing, perhaps future voting should be restricted to Premium Members or Free Users who registered before a certain cut-off? Also to be honest (and I mean this more in general, not about YOI), some of the nominees were just awful - I mean, just look at the Best Villain category and how such a small pool of titles filled such broad categories. Maybe it would actually be better for the public to vote for the nominations, then the panel select the overall winners?