D
Deleted member 4555
Guest
Hmmm.... does that mean you get a pension now?
Yeah, but it's **** XD
Hmmm.... does that mean you get a pension now?
My tagging?!? It was all @IncendiaryLemonYes, and your tagging perpetuated it all!
she's actually a dragon. I could recommend it if you're into slice of life with a twist!She must be a demon, I should know, I'm not 31, I'm actually nearly 300 y/o...I just look darn good for it
Must be those priestess powersShe must be a demon, I should know, I'm not 31, I'm actually nearly 300 y/o...I just look darn good for it
Must be those priestess powers
Oh, I forgot about that! Yeah, I really enjoyed it. It's very intricate.Hey @Neil.T , what about the film you saw? How was it?
Man, did you guys never learn rules 1&2? This thread is swimming in 4chanisms today.
Well if you don’t want it... I’m happy to take it off your hands.Yeah, but it's **** XD
What was it called? Didn't catch the title earlierOh, I forgot about that! Yeah, I really enjoyed it. It's very intricate.
It was about a newspaper reporter who digs up a year-old murder case and interviews people who knew the man and the woman who were murdered. As an audience, we're thrown into each interview not knowing who this person is and have to largely work it out for ourselves as it goes along, playing out in flashback segments.
But, in classic style, something that had seemed so clear-cut earlier on is subsequently thrown into doubt by the testimony of someone else.
The level of depravity on show before the end is quite shocking. I heard one guy in the cinema comment during the end credits, "Well, that was dark." I just thought it was really gripping. My attention didn't waver in the slightest for the whole two hours.
There's another film on tomorrow night: 'Japanese Girls Never Die". Looking forward to that as well.
You skint want to.I don't even know what a 4chanism is!
Oh, I forgot about that! Yeah, I really enjoyed it. It's very intricate.
It was about a newspaper reporter who digs up a year-old murder case and interviews people who knew the man and the woman who were murdered. As an audience, we're thrown into each interview not knowing who this person is and have to largely work it out for ourselves as it goes along, playing out in flashback segments.
But, in classic style, something that had seemed so clear-cut earlier on is subsequently thrown into doubt by the testimony of someone else.
The level of depravity on show before the end is quite shocking. I heard one guy in the cinema comment during the end credits, "Well, that was dark." I just thought it was really gripping. My attention didn't waver in the slightest for the whole two hours.
There's another film on tomorrow night: 'Japanese Girls Never Die". Looking forward to that as well.
You’re not up for the challenge?I give up, 25 pages since lunchtime. Insane people!
oh so that's what those chicken scratches were. I am "rule blind".Man, did you guys never learn rules 1&2? This thread is swimming in 4chanisms today.
@Neil.T did that in just replies to tagging him, you can do it!I give up, 25 pages since lunchtime. Insane people!
@Girls wIth Guns couldnt handle all that tagging so it’s a good job it’s down to @IncendiaryLemon to put up with it.@Neil.T did that in just replies to tagging him, you can do it!
Rules were made to be broken.oh so that's what those chicken scratches were. I am "rule blind".
some of it was probably my fault, I won't do it again
'Traces of Sin' (Gukoroku/Gukouroku).What was it called? Didn't catch the title earlier
the occasional scream into a pillow
Thank you kindly *Adds to ever-growing watchlist*'Traces of Sin' (Gukoroku/Gukouroku).