CitizenGeek
Guild Member
(The title is inspired by a documentary made by Richard Dawkins for Channel 4 in 2007; the title is clearly geared for sensationalism, which why I think it works!).
I've been thinking a lot about religion, atheism and rationalism lately, mainly because I've been watching a lot of interviews with anti-religious advocate and celebrated scientist Richard Dawkins. He claims that religious people are enemies of reason and that, in general, religion has had a corrupting influence on society. I'd like to ask the members of AUKN what you all think about this?
A belief in God is, if you think about it, very far fetched and entirely illogical. There's nothing even remotely resembling proof to support that there is a God, yet the burden of proof almost always lies on the skeptic to prove that there is no such thing as a God. I think this is unfair.
The idea of Russell's teapot is thus:
If I were to suggest that between the Earth and Mars there is a china teapot revolving about the sun in an elliptical orbit, nobody would be able to disprove my assertion provided I were careful to add that the teapot is too small to be revealed even by our most powerful telescopes. But if I were to go on to say that, since my assertion cannot be disproved, it is an intolerable presumption on the part of human reason to doubt it, I should rightly be thought to be talking nonsense. If, however, the existence of such a teapot were affirmed in ancient books, taught as the sacred truth every Sunday, and instilled into the minds of children at school, hesitation to believe in its existence would become a mark of eccentricity and entitle the doubter to the attentions of the psychiatrist in an enlightened age or of the Inquisitor in an earlier time.
So, opinions on religion in general, please! :]
I've been thinking a lot about religion, atheism and rationalism lately, mainly because I've been watching a lot of interviews with anti-religious advocate and celebrated scientist Richard Dawkins. He claims that religious people are enemies of reason and that, in general, religion has had a corrupting influence on society. I'd like to ask the members of AUKN what you all think about this?
A belief in God is, if you think about it, very far fetched and entirely illogical. There's nothing even remotely resembling proof to support that there is a God, yet the burden of proof almost always lies on the skeptic to prove that there is no such thing as a God. I think this is unfair.
The idea of Russell's teapot is thus:
If I were to suggest that between the Earth and Mars there is a china teapot revolving about the sun in an elliptical orbit, nobody would be able to disprove my assertion provided I were careful to add that the teapot is too small to be revealed even by our most powerful telescopes. But if I were to go on to say that, since my assertion cannot be disproved, it is an intolerable presumption on the part of human reason to doubt it, I should rightly be thought to be talking nonsense. If, however, the existence of such a teapot were affirmed in ancient books, taught as the sacred truth every Sunday, and instilled into the minds of children at school, hesitation to believe in its existence would become a mark of eccentricity and entitle the doubter to the attentions of the psychiatrist in an enlightened age or of the Inquisitor in an earlier time.
So, opinions on religion in general, please! :]