Will-O'-The-Wisp said:Lupus, isn't that first one Go-Go from Killbill? Lmao
Yup, thats Chiaki Kuriyama.
Will-O'-The-Wisp said:Lupus, isn't that first one Go-Go from Killbill? Lmao
She's certainly not bad looking (neither is Angelina if we're taking others' choices). No fair on people picking more than one. Example, the title says - singular! I could have overloaded the forum bandwith with women I consider beautiful...Jayme said:I also quite like Amanda Seyfriend, but I guess she's not conventional? I dunno.
Mutsumi said:
I win.
You might as well post more. I settled on Tina Fey.ayase said:No fair on people picking more than one. Example, the title says - singular! I could have overloaded the forum bandwith with women I consider beautiful...
ayase said:But of course, it's fine to see a picture of her in a skimpy outfit while browsing a forum eh Mutsumi?
But wow, Aria Giovanni... that brings back memories of when I was about fifteen and discovered what the internet was really for.
Back home most female celebrities reach the apex of their careers when they pose for Playboy.kupocake said:ITT: Photoshop perfectly exemplifies Female beauty.
People often say this with derision, as though there's something wrong with striving for perfection. We might not be the most beautiful people on earth, but wouldn't we choose to be if given the choice? Making do with what you have is not the road to progress. We re-do mouldy grouting and clean off rust from cars and respray them - we just can't do this very sucessfully with people yet. It's the flaw of the short-lifespan natural materials in our design. Once we're entirely synthetic, aesthitically pleasing design and replacement of worn parts will be much easier. At the moment photoshopping is just an illusion, but it's an illusion which points the way we want to go. We wouldn't be doing it if that wasn't what we really wanted.kupocake said:ITT: Photoshop perfectly exemplifies Female beauty.