Global Warming and Evolution

"CitizenGeek"]I'm not taking things at face value! Climate change, etc. are all backed up by enormous amounts of evidence (that I've even linked to in this thread). You are taking your hearsay, conspiracy ******** at face value - you provide nothing to back up your delusional claims!
Click to expand...

CG are you ever going to stop diggin yourself into a deeper hole here, I havint actually made any delusional claims, not one, all are backe dby as much science and logic as yours, Ive provided quotes and offered multiple times to go into further detail in another thread, something you seem to be keenly forgetting, and then theres the fact that Spyro linked you to a google search full of links to against anthropogenic global warming.

Outlawstar said:
Actually the "other side" to that technically is that humans see the sky as blue, not all creatures, thus the "fact" is very much subjective.
Click to expand...

And this is where our conversation ends. Enjoy all your conspiracy theories ;][
Click to expand...

Or in simpler terms, my point was perfectly valid and you have yet again passed it off with a derogatory, sarcastic and ultimately childish remark.
Need I say more?
 
CitizenGeek said:
I'm not taking things at face value! Climate change, etc. are all backed up by enormous amounts of evidence (that I've even linked to in this thread). You are taking your hearsay, conspiracy ******** at face value - you provide nothing to back up your delusional claims!

Outlawstar said:
Actually the "other side" to that technically is that humans see the sky as blue, not all creatures, thus the "fact" is very much subjective.
Click to expand...

And this is where our conversation ends. Enjoy all your conspiracy theories ;]
Click to expand...

:lol: You really brighten the place us CG xD
 
CitizenGeek said:
I'm not taking things at face value! Climate change, etc. are all backed up by enormous amounts of evidence (that I've even linked to in this thread). You are taking your hearsay, conspiracy ******** at face value - you provide nothing to back up your delusional claims!

Outlawstar said:
Actually the "other side" to that technically is that humans see the sky as blue, not all creatures, thus the "fact" is very much subjective.
Click to expand...

And this is where our conversation ends. Enjoy all your conspiracy theories ;]
Click to expand...

Quotes are proof, at least they where last i checked, maybe i missed something, i dunno, or maybe you did? I'd read over his messages again, you know, to make sure you know what he wrote properly. He already mentioned where he got his proof from and where you can get it from, if you want me to, i'm more than happy to back up his debate, but i won't post it here, i'll post it on another topic, where it is actually on topic.

Asides from that, i think we can go back to the original topic at hand instead of bombarding the topic with debates which are "one sided" in the sense that it appears some listen to others and the others don't.
 
Oh wow. So these quotes are so real that 3 people have said it's oh so easy to back them up, but that they just couldn't possibly go off topic (like, say, all three people have gone off topic in this thread already) and so will not post them.

You three are hilariously, pathetically, unapologetically, egregiously, hideously stupid. Please stop.
 
If you have the proof that these quotes come from a reliable organisation like the IPCC, then you would have posted them! Sheesh, are you three actually serious? I mean, I always knew AUKN had it's fair share of complete and utter village idiots, but this is just too much!
 
CitizenGeek said:
If you have the proof that these quotes come from a reliable organisation like the IPCC, then you would have posted them! Sheesh, are you three actually serious? I mean, I always knew AUKN had it's fair share of complete and utter village idiots, but this is just too much!
Click to expand...

Or, maybe, it's... you, that is the idiot :eek:

Outlawstar said his quote came from the IPCC. Why would he lie?
 
Or, maybe, it's, you, that's, un,able, to, use, commas? ,,

Outlawstar adores conspiracy theories and he obviously manipulates real information and real facts to fit these absurd theories. He's claiming it's a fact, he's not providing any evidence at all. What I claimed was fact, I backed up easily with just a simple search on Reuters.com - anyway, why are we even discussing whether or not someone needs to prove that their statements are true? If you weren't such a bunch of easily-lead imbeciles it would be clear as day that statements require proof!

Anyway, now that we have our own thread, I trust the proof that climate change is a sham will be forthcoming? (Of course, I know it won't be, because it's just a silly little conspiracy theory with nothing but blinkered idiots eager to believe that everyone else has got it wrong!).
 
CitizenGeek said:
Or, maybe, it's, you, that's, un,able, to, use, commas? ,,
Click to expand...

Actually, it was for dramatic effect. Say it out loud with the comma's and it should make sense *Shrug*

Think of the X-Files theme playing in the background too- it'll help.
 
Think of circus/mad scientist music playing in the background whenever you read Outlawstar's posts, it'll make the whole thing more understandable (the implication here is that Outlawstar is crazy for believing the ******** about evolution, 9/11, Al-Qaeda and climate change that he does, btw ;]).
 
CitizenGeek said:
Think of circus/mad scientist music playing in the background whenever you read Outlawstar's posts, it'll make the whole thing more understandable (the implication here is that Outlawstar is crazy for believing the ******** about evolution, 9/11, Al-Qaeda and climate change that he does, btw ;]).
Click to expand...

Oh-ho! You are quite the joker!

(I was sarcastic there, btw ;])
 
CitizenGeek said:
Or, maybe, it's, you, that's, un,able, to, use, commas? ,,

Outlawstar adores conspiracy theories and he obviously manipulates real information and real facts to fit these absurd theories. He's claiming it's a fact, he's not providing any evidence at all. What I claimed was fact, I backed up easily with just a simple search on Reuters.com - anyway, why are we even discussing whether or not someone needs to prove that their statements are true? If you weren't such a bunch of easily-lead imbeciles it would be clear as day that statements require proof!

Anyway, now that we have our own thread, I trust the proof that climate change is a sham will be forthcoming? (Of course, I know it won't be, because it's just a silly little conspiracy theory with nothing but blinkered idiots eager to believe that everyone else has got it wrong!).
Click to expand...


CG, please stop with the putting words in my mouth how many times do I have to ask, and again, please stop insulting me because you dont like what Im saying, its not moving this debate forward.

I NEVER SAID CLIMATE CHANGE WAS A SHAM!!!! WHERE DID YOU GET THAT ONE FROM!!!!!
I simply questioned the amount of hype surrounding the current trend, thats it, and that hype cannot be denied and has been addressed by many prominent researchers.

http://www.heartland.org/policybot/...es_More_Honest_Climate_Change_Discussion.html



And CG, my quotees are from the IPCC 2007 report, their latest one, they are working on a new one now, you cannot view it online, youll have to download it, should only take you a few mins, and then you can confirm what I said.

And they also say in this report that sea levels have risen 9cm in the last 50 years, so yeah we bettet head for the hills and all that.:p:p

And thanks for the topic change Arbalest!
 
CitizenGeek said:
Think of circus/mad scientist music playing in the background whenever you read Outlawstar's posts, it'll make the whole thing more understandable (the implication here is that Outlawstar is crazy for believing the ******** about evolution, 9/11, Al-Qaeda and climate change that he does, btw ;]).
Click to expand...

Oh and yes Im crazy, I just randomly sat in my room and thought to myself, I know, Im going to think of random counter theories to all the most respected stuff out there.
CG, you pretend your interested in debate, when it seems your more interested in passing slanderous, sardonic comments about others in the debate, hardly progressing matters. So Ill ask one more time that you please Stop.
 
Is it again becoming hard to tell the difference between a debate and making direct personal attacks on other posters?

R
 
Hah, what would a debate be without Rui coming along to single me out for the personal attacks that all 3 main posters in this thread are guilty of? :]
 
Firstly, yeah i split this up, to be honest the amount of times that a topic has been derailed to something different has been annoying, so i wanted this to be a seperate topic, as it should be. However if it just brings in more personal attacks i'll just close it regardless of how long its been since i split it, there is still no excuse for it.

On topic: I think the whole ice caps growing is proven in this blog post, yes its two years old, but that doesn't mean its not still happen.

http://icecap.us/index.php/go/joes-blog ... ove_normal
 
CitizenGeek said:
Hah, what would a debate be without Rui coming along to single me out for the personal attacks that all 3 main posters in this thread are guilty of? :]
Click to expand...

And did I name any names or quote any particular person in my post..?

R
 
It's just an odd coincidence that the last insult in this thread happenend to be made by me? And that while the other two were using personal insults galore (and I have no problem at all with that; they're not actually 'personal', of course!) nothing was said?

CG
 
CitizenGeek said:
It's just an odd coincidence that the last insult in this thread happenend to be made by me? And that while the other two were using personal insults galore (and I have no problem at all with that; they're not actually 'personal', of course!) nothing was said?

CG
Click to expand...

CG if you took anything I said as insults, I didint mean it and was in the heat of the moment, but I gotta say I dont remember outright attacking your demeanor the way you did mine, as much as your opinions can annoy me, I still have to accept them as yours, I dont outright deny them, or call you hilariously, pathetically, unapologetically, egregiously, hideously stupid crazy, delusional and a conspiracy theorist as you have done me.

Anyway, lets leave this matter aside for now, stick to the topic at hand.
 
CitizenGeek said:
It's just an odd coincidence that the last insult in this thread happenend to be made by me? And that while the other two were using personal insults galore (and I have no problem at all with that; they're not actually 'personal', of course!) nothing was said?

CG
Click to expand...

I was merely retaliating, however, I do confess I did personally attack CG in the same way he did to me.
 
Back
Top