CitizenGeek said:Ryukai said:They don't have the right to marriage, that's a religious thing. They have the right to a Civil Union though, so they can get the same rights a married couple. Just don't think it should be labelled a "marriage".
Marriage is not a religious thing, it pre-dates religion and the state is involved in handing out marriage licenses. If it was purely a religious thing, then it wouldn't matter; the point is, it's not a religious thing and therefore calling it anything less is discriminatory.
Oh that's right, if it was purely religious it wouldn't matter. So why do you feel like this:
CitizenGeek said:I think it's unfair that churches are allowed to get away with banning their clergy from carrying out same sex marriages. If a priest or vicar refused to perform an interracial marriage, or an all-black marriage, and cited some obscure 2000-year old verse would that be allowed? I don't think so. But yet it's a-okay to deny gay couples the right to get married in a church and everyone agrees that's how it should be. It doesn't strike me as being particularly fair or consistent.
Getting married in a church is a purely religious thing. Why should it matter if they don't want to go against their religion?