Review of Buso Renkin #1

Sy

Time-Traveller
<img src="http://www.animeuknews.net/img/uploaded/2008-11-065536741x.jpg">

<b>Review of Buso Renkin #1 by Sy</b>

<div align="left"><em>"Now go to hell! I'll splatter your guts!"</em>

Not the the catchiest of catchphrases I've heard but it cuts right to the point. Let that quote set the standard for the entire series.

Buso Renkin is the story of your average joe shonen, in this case a guy named Kazuki, getting himself mixed up in some crazy form of bother involving monsters and schoolgirls. One night he attempts to save a girl from impending death when in the process he gets stabbed through the chest by a giant snake and dies. The end? No, no of course not because the schoolgirl who he was trying to save is no ordinary schoolgirl, she's an alchemic warrior. She fights these monsters, which she calls Homunculus, by dressing like a schoolgirl and walking around dark alleys in the middle of the night. Personally I think her plan is ever so slightly flawed and might attract a different breed of bad guy.</div>
<div align="left">&nbsp;</div>
<div align="left">The schoolgirl, Tokiko, proceeds to revive Kazuki from the dead by inserting an alchemic device in his chest to replace his heart called the Kakugane. The manner in which she inserted the Kakugane made me crack a big smile because the only thing I could think it looked like was putting a disk in a car CD player. Maybe if you hold his mouth open he'll play back some Johnny Cash.</div>
<div align="left">&nbsp;</div>
<div align="left">The Kakugane combined with Kazuki's will to battle these Homunculi gave him his own Buso Renkin in the form of a giant spear with a piece of material hanging from it. I think Tokiko beat him on the best Buso Renkin weapon design though, in fact as far as it goes I'd say her metallic spider legs with knives weapon is one of the most unique aspects of the series so far. So anyway, with this new power he will protect his friends and his loved one's from these monsters that feed on humans.

My first thoughts were, 'I'm sure I've seen this before'. I could have sworn by it but after about halfway through the second episode I realized I was thinking of Bleach and then that was that. This series is pretty standard as far as shonen set ups go and when you watch the first few episodes of Bleach followed by the first few episodes of this the similarities are impossible to ignore. Before I go into that however I want to emphasize how flat the show seems. The character designs struck me as being stock and unimaginative and as far as the main characters go it just seemed like they thought 'Oh well we'll just give the chick a scar and the guy a haircut that defies physics' and with that they wrapped up the design work throwing in a 'happy go lucky' guy with an over the top haircut you'd probably see as the butt of the joke in Excel Saga for good merit. Nothing at all so far really stands out and screams originality and that can be fine if what it lacks in originality it makes up for in entertaining you. Even taking that in to account the bells still ring and the town crier shouts, 'AVERAGE!'.

As far as the villains go I apologise for not being able to take a guy dressed like Madame Butterfly in a thong seriously. About as intimidating as an Adam West Batman villain.

Now let's examine the Bleach (which began before Buso Renkin) connection.</div>
<ul>
<li>Both series have a mysterious female character that can perform some sort of other worldly technique to rid the world of monsters/homunculi/soul reapers or whatever and help the lead character.</li>
<li>Both of these female characters have a constant frown that rivals that of Gordon Ramsay's plastered across their face. They speak in semi-cryptic, monotone and it seems like if they ever stop being serious for even a moment they might get an electric shock to the face to put the frown right back where it belongs. Personally I tire of these kind of characters easily but you see these everywhere in anime so you might as well learn to get used to them.</li>
<li>The setting, at least in the early episodes of both series anyway. Both are set in suburban city districts where the battles proceed to take place in schools, abandoned warehouses and dark alleys. It's a more interesting setting than some other battle shows I can think of but most of the time the environment isn't used to it's full advantage and might as well take place in some pub in the Yorkshire Moors for all it matters.</li>
<li>The atmosphere. Again this may have something to do with the suburban setting but both of these series work very well when presenting action sequences in darkly lit environments giving those scenes an extra degree of menace that Buso Renkin sorely needs.</li>
<li>Both main characters have a collection of goofy school friends. You know those guys that provide a poor excuse for comic relief and just end up getting more and more loud and wacky as the series progresses.</li>
<li>The sweet, innocent, softly spoken, frustratingly positive, 'oh did I do that?' character with giant breasts that all the male characters fawn over makes a prominent appearance in both series. In Bleach there was Orihime and here we have the protagonists sister, Mahiro. They must store all that positive energy in their breasts.</li>
</ul>

I could go on but it's not just similarities to Bleach. I'm not really a fan of shonen fighting series in general but for the most part I can at least see the appeal. However in Buso Renkin it just strikes me that so much is borrowed and puzzle pieced together from other series that it loses any identity. If Buso has one up on other typical shonen shows of this style though it's that it's contained in just 26 episodes. A welcome relief than the thought of dread caused by knowing there's at least 200+ episodes of Bleach or Naruto that fans will feel obliged to sit through (Good luck with that). Despite not being padded out to the point of absurdity during battles the characters still manage to talk more than you would expect them to in heated battle situations. Everyone has a sob story to tell and a 'good reason' for what they're doing. You're just thinking, 'Dude, I don't care'.

Throughout the first half of the series there's nothing I can really say that stunned me in regard to twists and turns. Tokiko's stuffiness and hard done by girl who MUST at all costs carry out her mission routine gets more and more intolerable with each episode. With that school uniform she acts like some sort of pissed off Sailor Moon. Admittedly I fell asleep twice and I skipped several parts of episodes that seemed to drag but this is just a testament to the fact that it's pants.<br>
I just hope the second half off the series proves to be more refreshing than this first half.
<strong>
In Summary</strong>

The entire thing so far seems like a jigsaw of other more entertaining series. The characters are anime and shonen stereotypes in design and personality. Some interesting mechanical design work and a reasonably effective atmosphere is created but all in all nothing stands out enough to fans of shonen jump who will have seen it all already or anything to entice the more casual anime viewer. Unless the second half really turns the quality of the series around like several, but very few, series have succeeded in doing I don't see a great deal of reason why you should check this one out apart from the rather low price for a 13 episode box set. If you like pissed off Sailor Moon girls though then this one's for you.<br>
<b>Final score: 3 out of 10</b>

<b>Additional screencaps</b>

<img src="http://www.animeuknews.net/img/uploaded/screens/2008-11-06vlcsnap-819521.png">

<img src="http://www.animeuknews.net/img/uploaded/screens/2008-11-06vlcsnap-823326.png">

<img src="http://www.animeuknews.net/img/uploaded/screens/2008-11-06vlcsnap-825413.png">
 
I wish more reviews were like that; Hilarious. Oh.. and, I swear that is the lowest score on AUKN ever - Manga Ent must love you.

All of that, and more are the reasons I have no plans in my life to ever watch Buso Renkin.
 
Nice review, I lol'd, although it has to be said I never had much of an incentive to watch this show anyway.
Please tell me that's not a serious villain in the last picture. :S
 
Funny review. I bought it with a voucher because of Papillon screenshots in the past but haven't got around to watching yet (I read the review anyway because I could tell from a mile away this was going to be generic so spoilers are of no consequence). Sounds as though my expectations are pretty spot on this time ;)

R
 
I didn't even read the review, I didn't have to, I already knew that Sy would give it the right score, Buso Renkin is just... awful. The good points it has is epic [misleading] opening and a pretty good dub, Spike Spencer doesn't sound like Shinji Ikari in a dub role. Whoa.

I'll splatter your... guts! - I honestly think Tokiko should ditch Buso Renkin and get herself in Kenshin.
 
sanji no 1 said:
Man you people are hard to entertain

Yes, so ungrateful eh. There's so little in the way of half-naked butterfly mask villians these days.

I was put off even reading the synopisis for this one a while back, seems I wasn't wrong.
 
I intend to watch this series soon, but now I have had my expectations lowered, I will proably think its great. I find the lower my expectations are for a series, the better it is:p This has only ever been proved wrong with Yu Yu Hakusho which I rememberd thinking was great the first time, and was possibly better the second time around:p
 
Conan-san said:
I enjoyed this and thought the £20 I paid for it was well worth it.

As was the other £20 for the second set.

Course, that's just me.
Okay, who kidnapped Conan!? That has to be one of the only positive comments I have ever heard from you :p Still, i agree while Buso Renkin is not particularly original or spectacular it is at least entertaining in a generic, no-brainer kind of way.
 
Jayme said:
Oh.. and, I swear that is the lowest score on AUKN ever - Manga Ent must love you.
I reviewed Megaman Starforce. I was a lot less forgiving to that.
Dizzae said:
Please tell me that's not a serious villain in the last picture. :S
Who knows. He's presented as some weird comic relief but then in the next shot they could be trying to make him seem actually menacing. Is he meant to be a threat or comic relief? I don't know and I guess the writers didn't either.
Gawyn said:
Still, i agree while Buso Renkin is not particularly original or spectacular it is at least entertaining in a generic, no-brainer kind of way.
I'd agree with that if the series had any kind of charm or personality whatsoever.

I still have the second set to get through so we'll see if it gets any better.
 
Watch the first 8 episode and frankly it quite good. It very funny in places, some especially the characters especially like Captain bravo & Papillon. To say it clone of bleach is very missed judged, it like saying Yu Yu Hakusho & bleach are too similar. Shonen always share a lot of common traits, you could easily pick apart any shonen and find similarities with another shonen show.

It never going to be in the same class as One Piece, Bleach, etc but you never be able to match them fairly with Buso Renkin when those show in question have episodes number in the hundreds. So you never going to get the same depth & time to bulid up a story as they can.


If want a funny short 26 part action shonen which you can pick up for only just over £20 it good value for money.

It would be nice people would just watch the show and the make their own opinion good/bad instead a following other people views like sheep.
 
Dave said:
It would be nice people would just watch the show and the make their own opinion good/bad instead a following other people views like sheep.
Funny, I've read through all the comments in this thread and nobody has said they're not going to watch this show based on Sy's review.

Although it does beg the question of what the purpose of reviews actually are if not to help people make decisions about what to spend their time and money on :roll:
 
fabricatedlunatic said:
Dave said:
It would be nice people would just watch the show and the make their own opinion good/bad instead a following other people views like sheep.
Funny, I've read through all the comments in this thread and nobody has said they're not going to watch this show based on Sy's review.

Although it does beg the question of what the purpose of reviews actually are if not to help people make decisions about what to spend their time and money on :roll:
Personally I never put any stock in reviews. Anybody other than myself cannot possibly tell me what I will like. That is not to say that any particular reviews or reviewers are bad, just that the reviewer will be unlikely to have the exact same taste as myself. I will usually skim a review, if I bother reading at all after I have watched a title and formed an opinion of my own mostly to see how others perceive it as opposed to my own view. Sometimes I will read a couple of reviews to get a taste for what an anime is like if I am undecided on it.
 
I only really take reviews seriously if they're from someone I know has freakishly similar taste to me (exceptionally rare) or if they're a massive fan of the genre. For example, I'd take a hardcore ninja anime fan's view on a new ninja anime more seriously than the average person's, as the fan would often be looking for reasons to like it that might get missed otherwise.

Technical reviews, with video/audio quality as the focus, can also be pretty interesting sometimes.

The rest is mostly entertainment and to see what others thought of a series. I like Sy's reviews because they're entertaining to read. However I bought Buso Renkin because the stupid, campy things about it which make Sy shudder work well in the case of something I'm expecting to enjoy mindlessly but not spend too much on. That and Papillon is cool obviously.

Some people do seem to take single reviews as the absolute facts but hopefully they eventually realise that shopping around gives a much broader perspective...

Perhaps people could post little counter-reviews to those they strongly disagree with. Then people looking in to see one will get to read another as a bonus and make a judgement :)

R
 
I don't think a reviewer necessarily has to share a reader's taste to write a review that is useful to them. ANN's reviews of Aria are a good example. Their reviews of the first two sets are overwhelmingly positive, yet they make clear in the text that because of the show's nature, dead-inside cynical bastards (like me) need not apply. Hence, the content of these positive reviews actually steered me away from the show (although, against my better judgement, I watched the first series anyway and predictably wished I hadn't).
 
Dave said:
It never going to be in the same class as One Piece, Bleach, etc but you never be able to match them fairly with Buso Renkin when those show in question have episodes number in the hundreds. So you never going to get the same depth & time to bulid up a story as they can.
Well that's a bad example because other much shorter shows seem be able to build developed, layered stories AND characters in a matter of 13 episodes, hell I've seen it done with the length of an hour and a half long movie countless times. So as far as the short length being an excuse for why the story is cliche and the characters one dimensional I say that it's no excuse at all.
 
fabricatedlunatic said:
Dave said:
It would be nice people would just watch the show and the make their own opinion good/bad instead a following other people views like sheep.
Funny, I've read through all the comments in this thread and nobody has said they're not going to watch this show based on Sy's review.

Although it does beg the question of what the purpose of reviews actually are if not to help people make decisions about what to spend their time and money on :roll:

Looking at the following of people made judgment on it without even watching it and using someone else opinion to back it up.

Jayme said:
All of that, and more are the reasons I have no plans in my life to ever watch Buso Renkin.

Martin said:
I suspect this is one of those times when the review is more entertaining than watching the series itself...good work Sy. ^_^

Dizzae said:
Nice review, I lol'd, although it has to be said I never had much of an incentive to watch this show anyway.
Please tell me that's not a serious villain in the last picture. :S

People should form there own opinion like what I, Gawyn and to certain extent Rui have said, it not like you can't preview a few episodes before hand for free, a lot of episodes can even be previewed for free legally these days.

Sy said:
Dave said:
It never going to be in the same class as One Piece, Bleach, etc but you never be able to match them fairly with Buso Renkin when those show in question have episodes number in the hundreds. So you never going to get the same depth & time to build up a story as they can.
Well that's a bad example because other much shorter shows seem be able to build developed, layered stories AND characters in a matter of 13 episodes, hell I've seen it done with the length of an hour and a half long movie countless times. So as far as the short length being an excuse for why the story is cliche and the characters one dimensional I say that it's no excuse at all.

It shonen aimed primarly aimed at kids it not going to be Evangelion, it bit a fun not meant to be overall complex. If you look at the best shonen, they all are long series for the reasons I said before to slow build up to epic climax. If you take One Piece for example, the arc which considered the best is 78 episodes long and that does not include other episodes required to build on that either.

To compare to buso renkin to been too similar to bleach which is main argument in the review is flawed, there so many things which are different in the 2 series, to give each their own personality while at the same time keep the similar quality that a lot shonen share.

People who are going to buy this are probably going to fans of an existing shonen fighting titles, As you said yourself you don't like fighting shonen, so how can you give a balanced review on if you don't even like genre you reviewing. It would be like me reviewing superman when I don't like USA superhero comic books, In so giving it totally unfair review and so pointless review.
 
All of those people you quoted clearly had little interest in Buso Renkin prior to reading the review. They are not, as you claim, "sheep" who need other people to tell them what not to watch. And even if there are legal means through which to view all kinds of entertainment, why should someone spend precious time on something they have no interest in? It makes no sense.
 
Back
Top