Bahubali 2 The Conclusion
One thing that could be better is the CGI, I don't mind this myself as it still looks good enough considering that it is generating some absolutely bonkers scenes anyway so realism is not a priority but it does look inconsistent with the live action; with that said, the film tends to only use it when needed (unlike most MCU films), otherwise there are a lot of practical effects that are really good; also the use of CGI is way more interesting than modern Hollywood films anyway, with one scene in the middle being up there with some of the best Dreamworks movies; personally I vastly prefer interesting uses of CGI that has a story to it to CGI that looks good and it's clear that the priority here is the former.
Glad you enjoyed it.
I'm not sure it's a case of
prioritisation as simply the capabilities of the Indian film industry; it was the most expensive Indian film ever made at the time, but that's still only equates to a budget of $37 million. That's a few million less than the budget for the most recent Downton Abbey film. While some of the visual effects aren't up to the standards you might expect from a Hollywood production, I think they're still relatively impressive considering their comparative limited budget and resources.
I've been watching a lot more Indian cinema recently and there's some truly extraordinary films that have been made in the past few decades. I suspect that it hasn't really broken through in the West until now is a combination of unfamiliar form (while we are au fait with a musical, totally breaking away from the narrative for a tangentially-related fourth-wall breaking musical number is a bit jarring to the uninitiated) and an indifferent industry - when they are released in Cineworlds here, they're aimed at the Indian diaspora rather than trying to advertise to the masses. They're not screened for critics, get next to no press, and aren't released on DVD/Blu-Ray afterward. Hopefully that will change.
Some I've watched recently:
Sholay (Ramesh Sippy, 1975) -
An epoch-making film in Indian cinema, Sholay is a near-3 1/2 hour western/musical adrenaline rush heavily influenced by the films of Sergio Leone and
Once Upon a Time in the West in particular.
Dharmendra and a magnetic Amitabh Bachchan star as a couple of convicts who are hired by the policeman (Sanjeev Kumar) who once caught them in order to help him bring the villainous bandit leader Gabbar Singh to justice.
Sholay is a film that feels like it lurches from moment to moment, set piece to set piece, with its audience strapped into the seat of its rollercoster as it goes around its twists and turns, punctuating a relatively traditional Western landscape with bursts of colour and song.
I don't know enough about the social or political situation in India to be confident in attempting deeper analysis of the film but it seems to be largely in favour of post-colonial symbols of power, with its hero(es) finding purpose having been adopted into civil society to oppose a cyclonic, pitiless, agent of chaos. In any case, I found it to be thrilling entertainment - maximalist cinema that attempts to be something to everyone and quite possibly succeeds.
Nayakan (Mani Ratnam, 1987) -
I loved this - a gangster epic that has frequently been called India's answer to The Godfather but, to me, bears more similarity to Kinji Fukasaku's Battles Without Honor and Humanity with its kineticism and verve.
Where it differs from most other gangster films is in the motivations of its protagonist - Kamal Hassan's Velu certainly has no regard for the law, but he is driven not for financial gain, or even will to power, but to help the downtrodden in a profoundly unequal society. He fashions himself in the Robin Hood mould but for too long doesn't fully consider the collateral damage in the cycle of violence that he perpetuates.
Like most Indian films of this vintage, it's a film in desperate need of restoration but the print available to stream of Amazon is watchable through the scratches and color fluctuations.
Bombay (Mani Ratnam, 1995) - The star-crossed lovers plot has been a well worn trope since Antiquity, but Mani Ratnam's mid-90s take has to be one of my favourite in cinema. A Hindu boy and a Muslim girl fall in love in late 80s India. Understandably, this causes some family drama and they end up eloping together without parental permission. So far, so unremarkable, though it's very well done in its own right. Then, cut to 92-93 and the outbreak of Hindu-Muslim violence provoked by the destruction of the Babri Masjit by Hindu nationalists and suddenly our young couple are facing danger from both sides in a confusing maelstrom of senseless destruction for what they represent - neither Hindu, nor Muslim, nor neither, but an example of unity and progression. Magnificent - and a film that seems to have only grown in power, considering the developments in India since, which have seen right-wing Hindu nationalist Narendra Modi elected Prime Minister despite questions over his role in the 2002 Gujarat riots that saw nearly 1000 Muslims killed.
Ponniyin Selvan: Part I (Mani Ratnam, 2022) - My most anticipated film of the year is undoubtedly the second part of this historical epic which is a strong challenger to RRR for best Indian film of 2022.