There's nothing in any TV anime that should break that.Ryo Chan said:And give a 12 rating as well?
Either Manga and the BFCC haven't heard of the dangerous cartoons act or i'll actually have to give them a +rep on that
fabricatedlunatic said:As it should be - it's a cartoon and all very light hearted. But if the Lucchini boob grabs and the copious crotch shots were not enough to send the examiners into a blind panic, I'm even more mystified at the Geass edit. Oh well.
I'd imagine Vampire Bund will sail through uncut as well.
Ryo Chan said:fabricatedlunatic said:As it should be - it's a cartoon and all very light hearted. But if the Lucchini boob grabs and the copious crotch shots were not enough to send the examiners into a blind panic, I'm even more mystified at the Geass edit. Oh well.
I'd imagine Vampire Bund will sail through uncut as well.
whatabout the nudety in the baths? there must be a reason crunchyroll censored it
That was probably their reasoning, but I don't see what difference it makes. It's not like the fanservice in Strike Witches (the lingering Sanya crotch shot right at the start of episode 7 for example) has any relevance to the plot most of the time.Shiroi Hane said:The still from Code Geass had no context - that is the main differentiator.
Lawrence said:To be honest, Strike witches got rated R I think in the states but a BBFC rating of 12 wasn't entirely impossible.
Remember...
Japanese Agency for Cultural Affairs deemed Strike Witches as "wholesome family entertainment" in 2008.
Ryo Chan said:Lawrence said:To be honest, Strike witches got rated R I think in the states but a BBFC rating of 12 wasn't entirely impossible.
Remember...
Japanese Agency for Cultural Affairs deemed Strike Witches as "wholesome family entertainment" in 2008.
5 mins looking on the box
and i can't even see a bloody rating
you can only get a 15 off swearing alone.Mohawk52 said:This is nothing new. Episode 7 of Hell Girl had so much effn & blinden going on it was easily a 15, possibly even 18, but it was rated at 12. I'm guessing SW was one of the last videos to check on a Friday afternoon so they slapped a 12 on it and headed out for the weekend early.
Ryo Chan said:Either Manga and the BFCC haven't heard of the dangerous cartoons act or i'll actually have to give them a +rep on that
Project-2501 said:Ryo Chan said:Either Manga and the BFCC haven't heard of the dangerous cartoons act or i'll actually have to give them a +rep on that
Why? That has no effect on how the BBFC rates anything. And either way you see no sex or genitals in SW.
Even the code geass cut had nothing to do with the 'dangerous cartoons acr'.
All nudity is okay, read the BBFC rules.Ryo Chan said:Project-2501 said:Ryo Chan said:Either Manga and the BFCC haven't heard of the dangerous cartoons act or i'll actually have to give them a +rep on that
Why? That has no effect on how the BBFC rates anything. And either way you see no sex or genitals in SW.
Even the code geass cut had nothing to do with the 'dangerous cartoons acr'.
yet breasts are still allowed?
I love this idea that the censors sit around and go "Hmm, gratuitous sexualisation of under aged characters? Fine, in context. One shot of a girl covering her bare chest? Out of context, banned."Reaper gI said:All nudity is okay, read the BBFC rules.Ryo Chan said:yet breasts are still allowed?Project-2501 said:Why? That has no effect on how the BBFC rates anything. And either way you see no sex or genitals in SW.Ryo Chan said:Either Manga and the BFCC haven't heard of the dangerous cartoons act or i'll actually have to give them a +rep on that
Even the code geass cut had nothing to do with the 'dangerous cartoons acr'.
Geass' issue was it was out of context.