London Anime Con on 30th to 31st 2011

Neferpitou said:
These conventions can't surely be that bad, otherwise they wouldn't be several of them running each year? It would be nice to hear an honest opinion about these events, instead of all the allegation and name calling over a person involved with these events.
Click to expand...
Well, after looking into the drama a bit (all I know about AL is that I once got a flyer about it from somewhere, and then forgot all about it), and even taking his ED article with the appropriate shovelful of salt, there is the fact that he has the honour of being the only the only person ever banned from the London MCM ExpoL: http://www.mcmexpogroup.com/forums/view ... 56#p526256
 
Neferpitou said:
Yeah, that why you replied to it with your own quip then ;). If you Don't like the remark, then don't get involved by butting in with an air of superiority. If someone made silly claims that you were a certain controversial figure, you would at least would want to reply with how silly a suggestion it was.

It makes me wonder why I bother to put the effort into post News, when I get such inane and confrontational responses.
Click to expand...

Ok, I'll shut up then.
 
Shiroi Hane said:
Neferpitou said:
These conventions can't surely be that bad, otherwise they wouldn't be several of them running each year? It would be nice to hear an honest opinion about these events, instead of all the allegation and name calling over a person involved with these events.
Click to expand...
Well, after looking into the drama a bit (all I know about AL is that I once got a flyer about it from somewhere, and then forgot all about it), and even taking his ED article with the appropriate shovelful of salt, there is the fact that he has the honour of being the only the only person ever banned from the London MCM ExpoL: http://www.mcmexpogroup.com/forums/view ... 56#p526256
Click to expand...

That still only evidence against Michael Towers and not an unbiased view on the event that he is involved with.

While there's no question that Michael Towers deserves considered criticism for what he has done in the past. The people who contributed to ED article don't exactly come out looking that great either. Claiming he is a paedophile, general name calling and recommending to troll his website is not exactly the most dignified thing write.
 
revertedtozero said:
Neferpitou said:
Yeah, that why you replied to it with your own quip then ;). If you Don't like the remark, then don't get involved by butting in with an air of superiority. If someone made silly claims that you were a certain controversial figure, you would at least would want to reply with how silly a suggestion it was.

It makes me wonder why I bother to put the effort into post News, when I get such inane and confrontational responses.
Click to expand...

Ok, I'll shut up then.
Click to expand...

Sounds good Mr 36 posts
 
Neferpitou said:
The people who contributed to ED article don't exactly come out looking that great either. Claiming he is a paedophile, general name calling and recommending to troll his website is not exactly the most dignified thing write.
Click to expand...
It's ED, hence the salt and looking for more reputable reports.
 
Back
Top