Leaders all agreed on TV live debate

Spyro201 said:
Outlawstar said:
Im really tired of people not seeing through the mass media driven DREAM WORLD, its time to take off the blinkers and actively engage in seeking the truth.
Its time to see your reality in a new way, its time to consider society and its machinations in a new light, its time to cast aside assumption and let loose the human desire to discover, un-impeded by dogma or bias, a non partial examination of why society is the way it has become, and question the extent to which those at the very helm of society, define it, control it, guide it and the purpose behind such all encompassing control, simply put, QUESTION EVERYTHING, DENY IGNORANCE!!!

QFT.

I see someone else likes their Conspiracy DVD's too ;)


Lets just say Ive read a lot of books,nd continue to on a WIDE variety of topics, and Im of course reluctant to refer to such "alternate" information, as "conspiracy", as along with that comes the usual stigma and seemingly inherent untruthfullness, Im not claiming to me some sort of all knowinng demi-god, Im learning as I go like anyone and I consider my self not to have beliefs, but currents stances, stances which are with no problem prone to change in the face of evidence, new info etc.:)
 
Outlawstar said:
Spyro201 said:
Lets just say Ive read a lot of books,nd continue to on a WIDE variety of topics, and Im of course reluctant to refer to such "alternate" information, as "conspiracy", as along with that comes the usual stigma and seemingly inherent untruthfullness, Im not claiming to me some sort of all knowinng demi-god, Im learning as I go like anyone and I consider my self not to have beliefs, but currents stances, stances which are with no problem prone to change in the face of evidence, new info etc.:)

Hey ho ha whoa bro. I'm agreeing with you. Sure, conspiracies are normally associated with delusional old guys with beards, but, many of them make sense. Many raise valid points. I change my beliefs as you do, we've been over this before if ya' recall.

I was just backing you up bro. I'm mainly a DVD man. I don't have much time for reading. I've got so much to read for my studies at the moment, i'd get way to engrossed in conspiracy books for my own good.

Anyhoo yeah, I was just backing ya' up ;) :)
 
Spyro201 said:
Outlawstar said:
Spyro201 said:
Lets just say Ive read a lot of books,nd continue to on a WIDE variety of topics, and Im of course reluctant to refer to such "alternate" information, as "conspiracy", as along with that comes the usual stigma and seemingly inherent untruthfullness, Im not claiming to me some sort of all knowinng demi-god, Im learning as I go like anyone and I consider my self not to have beliefs, but currents stances, stances which are with no problem prone to change in the face of evidence, new info etc.:)

Hey ho ha whoa bro. I'm agreeing with you. Sure, conspiracies are normally associated with delusional old guys with beards, but, many of them make sense. Many raise valid points. I change my beliefs as you do, we've been over this before if ya' recall.

I was just backing you up bro. I'm mainly a DVD man. I don't have much time for reading. I've got so much to read for my studies at the moment, i'd get way to engrossed in conspiracy books for my own good.

Anyhoo yeah, I was just backing ya' up ;) :)

He Dont worry Spyro, I knew you were backinng me up;)

I was just clarifying for anyone else who may see me as just that bearded old man you speak of:p

The great thing about readinng is, you can read for 10 mins of 10 hours, its so flexible:)
Whatever suits you bro, sall good;)
 
Hey Outlawstar, Spyro.

I agree there is a hell of a lot more going on under the surface of governance that the average person never thinks about or questions, and I have previously looked into a lot of 'conspiracy theories', but came to the conclusion that although there have been isolated conspiracies by powerful people of the time (Organised Crime, Industry, Secret Services, Media - and sometimes several of these working together) I've never found any hard evidence to support overarching conspiracies lasting for any longer than a few decades.

You quote Disraeli there Outlawstar, who was an ardent Imperialist. My question on the supposed long-term 'New World Order' conspiracy is this: Why would proponents of a World Government allow something as close to their dream as the British Empire to fall apart? America could easily have prevented it from doing so after World War II, but chose to let it disintegrate. They chose even to undermine it utterly when they forced a cease-fire on Britain, Israel, and France at Suez. Those are not the actions of a nation interested in building a World Government. Those are the actions of an entirely self-interested nation. Even if there are people working behind the scenes to achieve it, I wish they'd hurry it up. A World State is a great idea. Plenty of decent people have been proponents of World Government (H. G. Wells for one) and I can't possibly see it being a bad thing for most people on this planet. It would sort out a hell of a lot of our problems.

Society, I think, is the way it is because a small minority are more intelligent than the vast majority, and some of these same intelligent people are ruthless bastards willing to do anything to hold onto power and wealth. They claw their way to, then stay at the top like the Bush family, Rupert Murdoch, etc. but it doesn't last forever. Eventually their descendants give birth to stupid children or squander their fortunes and other, similarly inclined people take their place. That's just how it it. Survival of the most fortunate, most ruthless, most selfish, most manipulative. It's a horrible truth, but I'm pretty convinced that it is The Truth - and that it isn't really any more complicated than that.
 
ayase said:
Hey Outlawstar, Spyro.

I agree there is a hell of a lot more going on under the surface of governance that the average person never thinks about or questions, and I have previously looked into a lot of 'conspiracy theories', but came to the conclusion that although there have been isolated conspiracies by powerful people of the time (Organised Crime, Industry, Secret Services, Media - and sometimes several of these working together) I've never found any hard evidence to support overarching conspiracies lasting for any longer than a few decades.

You quote Disraeli there Outlawstar, who was an ardent Imperialist. My question on the supposed long-term 'New World Order' conspiracy is this: Why would proponents of a World Government allow something as close to their dream as the British Empire to fall apart? America could easily have prevented it from doing so after World War II, but chose to let it disintegrate. They chose even to undermine it utterly when they forced a cease-fire on Britain, Israel, and France at Suez. Those are not the actions of a nation interested in building a World Government. Those are the actions of an entirely self-interested nation. Even if there are people working behind the scenes to achieve it, I wish they'd hurry it up. A World State is a great idea. Plenty of decent people have been proponents of World Government (H. G. Wells for one) and I can't possibly see it being a bad thing for most people on this planet. It would sort out a hell of a lot of our problems.

Society, I think, is the way it is because a small minority are more intelligent than the vast majority, and some of these same intelligent people are ruthless bastards willing to do anything to hold onto power and wealth. They claw their way to, then stay at the top like the Bush family, Rupert Murdoch, etc. but it doesn't last forever. Eventually their descendants give birth to stupid children or squander their fortunes and other, similarly inclined people take their place. That's just how it it. Survival of the most fortunate, most ruthless, most selfish, most manipulative. It's a horrible truth, but I'm pretty convinced that it is The Truth - and that it isn't really any more complicated than that.


Ayase you bring up some good points and I would like to answer you more fully tomorow when Im less half asleep,:)

However I dare say you need to do a lot more reserch if thats the conclusion you came to in terms of length of collusion, just look at the Federal Reserve System, probably the biggest scam and fraud in history, and its still goionng strong, most people dont even realise its not even part of the government, federal is just a proxy monicker, nothing more.
They are completely and utterly corrupt and this is one of the main ways in which the bankers and "intellectualy elites" as they like to call themselves easily control economies, infaltion, depression etc.

Id advise you read some book on the subject bro:)


As for the British Empire, all I can say is more research will help out here, the British Empire was a completely seperate faction of such orders of which we speak, it was the Bavarian Illuminati under Adam Weishaput who orchestrated the downfall of the British Empire for their own world reaching plans, and every war andn revolution since, this is not a cut and dried thing in which one group is involved, as deeper research will alert you to.


And what you have yo understand about your last statement on society is that while it is disturbinngly accurate how you have laid it out, its not neccesarily the way things simply are, knowledge is power, and although it can seem hopeless, self soveirgnty through awareness is a step in the right direction.;)


Its just not as cut and dried as powerful people clawing to the top like Bush as you say, Bush is a member of a secret society called teh skull and bones and so was his running mate carrey, and his father, and his father before, anyone who really thinks democracy still exists needs a swift history lesson into ancient royalty, royal bloodlinnes, and social darwinistic elites with delusions of grandeur.

There is method to this madness, that I am sure of.

Also if you really think a One World Governments run as it will inevitably be by the likes of the puppets we have inn charge, than I completely unsmugly think you would benefit from more research, these are the people that keep Africa and other third World countries in debt, never allowinng them to rise up by design, perpetrating the Global Wrming hoax as another reason for the third world to STAY that way, , who have carried out THOUSANDS of illegal testing of killer chemiicals over unsuspecting populatins, like the illegal human uranium testing durinng the infamous Manhatton Project, or Project Shad, along with a host of others, the people who created Operation Northwoods, the people who knew about pearl harbour before it happened but let it happen, and thats just the half of it, you really want people like that running a world government, I DONT THINK SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH!!!


:)
 
Arbalest said:
SundayMorningCall said:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/8289367.stm

seems like there gonna have to invite other party leaders too...

Er...SNP in a debate about who runs the parlament...in england? genius! except..he has no way of getting a position there..so he's a fool. Seriously, he does not need a place in it at all and to me, it only seems like he wants to interfere, he won't get more popularity for this in scotland i can assure ya..not like he is popular anyway.
Alex Salmond is an attention whore. Not a week goes by where he's not making a visit somewhere and getting in the papers. I really have to question the stupidity of my fellow Scots in voting SNP.
 
Outlawstar said:
However I dare say you need to do a lot more reserch if thats the conclusion you came to in terms of length of collusion, just look at the Federal Reserve System, probably the biggest scam and fraud in history, and its still goionng strong, most people dont even realise its not even part of the government, federal is just a proxy monicker, nothing more.
They are completely and utterly corrupt and this is one of the main ways in which the bankers and "intellectualy elites" as they like to call themselves easily control economies, infaltion, depression etc.
Err, you forgot to add the human factor in it.

Even though you can influence people, you cannot control them. At least not for long. Also, I don't belive that there has ever been a period in human history were we, human beings, have been so individualistic.

One of the words I hear the most in cultural circles is diversity. I don't believe you can control diversity (unless you do like Hitler and try to erradicate it, but well, this is a different story).

WRT to the FED. Is the FED corrupt? I couldn't tell. But it is part of the US government. It is independent as the judicial system is independent, simply because it has to have the authority to investigate members of the goverment as well.

Although people blame organizations like the FED for the current crisis, the real issue were those people stupid enoug hto get into loans bigger than their ability to pay.

But them again, if the newspapers tried to blame them, the people would turn against the newspaper for trying to beat the dead dog. Now, blaming the bankers because they are rewarded enormous amounts of money is pretty easy. Everyone likes to gang up on those who are doing well, after all.

Also, I'm not convinced its in the best interest of everyone to end the bankers bonuses like they are proposing. Bankers will simply lose their enthusiasm as the reward is not so appealing any longer.

Even though I hate to admit it, it's because of the bankers that economies grow. Put it in a simplistic form, their basic job is to help those who need money to invest and grow (companies, farms, whatever) meet those who have money (investors).
 
Err, you forgot to add the human factor in it.

Even though you can influence people, you cannot control them. At least not for long. Also, I don't belive that there has ever been a period in human history were we, human beings, have been so individualistic.

Okay I must disagree here,



One of the words I hear the most in cultural circles is diversity. I don't believe you can control diversity (unless you do like Hitler and try to erradicate it, but well, this is a different story).

In other words you can, especially if you hold all the keys to the doors of society, just look into the very origin of feminism, so called new cultural ideologies and divergences are a lot less spontaneous than you might think my friend.

WRT to the FED. Is the FED corrupt? I couldn't tell. But it is part of the US government. It is independent as the judicial system is independent, simply because it has to have the authority to investigate members of the goverment as well.

Plain and simply the fed is PRIVATE OWNED, they are under NO-ONES power, thats a fact, Alan Greenspan himself admitted it, they are a seperate entity with their own agenda and the ability to control in conjunction with other corrupt private banking institutes aroudn the world to literally control the economy, credit flow, inflation, deflation etc.
Just research the origin of the entity.

Whoever controls the volume of money in any country is absolute master of all industry and commerce
." -- James A. Garfield, President of the United States


"Every Congressman, every Senator knows precisely what causes inflation...but can't, [won't] support the drastic reforms to stop it [repeal of the Federal Reserve Act] because it could cost him his job." -- Robert A. Heinlein, Expanded Universe

"Some [Most] people think the Federal Reserve Banks are the United States government's institutions. They are not government institutions. They are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign swindlers." -- Congressional Record 12595-12603 -- Louis T. McFadden, Chairman of the Committee on Banking and Currency (12 years) June 10, 1932





But them again, if the newspapers tried to blame them, the people would turn against the newspaper for trying to beat the dead dog. Now, blaming the bankers because they are rewarded enormous amounts of money is pretty easy. Everyone likes to gang up on those who are doing well, after all.

Not as cut and dried as that my friend, not at all.

Also, I'm not convinced its in the best interest of everyone to end the bankers bonuses like they are proposing. Bankers will simply lose their enthusiasm as the reward is not so appealing any longer.

Even though I hate to admit it, it's because of the bankers that economies grow. Put it in a simplistic form, their basic job is to help those who need money to invest and grow (companies, farms, whatever) meet those who have money (investors).
[/quote]

That is not the nature of a bank in the modern age. Do the pros outweigh the cons, everyone can have an opinion, but if we are to have a banking system that actually works, private institutions like the FED need to be audited and abolished.
 
Outlawstar said:
One of the words I hear the most in cultural circles is diversity. I don't believe you can control diversity (unless you do like Hitler and try to erradicate it, but well, this is a different story).
In other words you can, especially if you hold all the keys to the doors of society, just look into the very origin of feminism, so called new cultural ideologies and divergences are a lot less spontaneous than you might think my friend.
I agree to some extent. The so called Neo-liberalism is an example or a forced new ideology. But why do you think that new ideologies are fabricated? I might be missing something here.

Outlawstar said:
WRT to the FED. Is the FED corrupt? I couldn't tell. But it is part of the US government. It is independent as the judicial system is independent, simply because it has to have the authority to investigate members of the goverment as well.

Plain and simply the fed is PRIVATE OWNED, they are under NO-ONES power, thats a fact, Alan Greenspan himself admitted it, they are a seperate entity with their own agenda and the ability to control in conjunction with other corrupt private banking institutes aroudn the world to literally control the economy, credit flow, inflation, deflation etc.
Just research the origin of the entity.
Where did you read that the FED is privately owned? American congress decide on the FED's board and although the FED has a lot od autonomy, it still do what the american congress decide (i.e. inject money into the economy).

FED website said:
How is the Federal Reserve System structured?

The Federal Reserve System has a structure designed by Congress to give it a broad perspective on the economy and on economic activity in all parts of the nation. It is a federal system, composed basically of a central, governmental agency--the Board of Governors--in Washington, D.C., and twelve regional Federal Reserve Banks, located in major cities throughout the nation. These components share responsibility for supervising and regulating certain financial institutions and activities; for providing banking services to depository institutions and to the federal government; and for ensuring that consumers receive adequate information and fair treatment in their business with the banking system.

A major component of the System is the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), which is made up of the members of the Board of Governors, the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and presidents of four other Federal Reserve Banks, who serve on a rotating basis. The FOMC oversees open market operations, which is the main tool used by the Federal Reserve to influence money market conditions and the growth of money and credit.

More information
Who owns the Federal Reserve?

The Federal Reserve System is not "owned" by anyone and is not a private, profit-making institution. Instead, it is an independent entity within the government, having both public purposes and private aspects.

As the nation's central bank, the Federal Reserve derives its authority from the U.S. Congress. It is considered an independent central bank because its decisions do not have to be ratified by the President or anyone else in the executive or legislative branch of government, it does not receive funding appropriated by Congress, and the terms of the members of the Board of Governors span multiple presidential and congressional terms. However, the Federal Reserve is subject to oversight by Congress, which periodically reviews its activities and can alter its responsibilities by statute. Also, the Federal Reserve must work within the framework of the overall objectives of economic and financial policy established by the government. Therefore, the Federal Reserve can be more accurately described as "independent within the government."

The twelve regional Federal Reserve Banks, which were established by Congress as the operating arms of the nation's central banking system, are organized much like private corporations--possibly leading to some confusion about "ownership." For example, the Reserve Banks issue shares of stock to member banks. However, owning Reserve Bank stock is quite different from owning stock in a private company. The Reserve Banks are not operated for profit, and ownership of a certain amount of stock is, by law, a condition of membership in the System. The stock may not be sold, traded, or pledged as security for a loan; dividends are, by law, 6 percent per year.
 
I agree to some extent. The so called Neo-liberalism is an example or a forced new ideology. But why do you think that new ideologies are fabricated? I might be missing something here.

I dont mean all ideologies of course, Im just saying some research into the creation and dissemination through various propogandist means for very specific purposes of certain ideologies is most certainly shown to happen, and not for the good of you and me let me tell you.


Where did you read that the FED is privately owned? American congress decide on the FED's board and although the FED has a lot od autonomy, it still do what the american congress decide (i.e. inject money into the economy).

Like I said Greenspan himself admitted it, listen whatever you read about congress and the FED, is crap, the facts speak for themselves, the congress have NO control over the fed, the fed have repeatedly refused congress acces to fed transactions, congress knows this, they know who really runs the show, at least some of them as evidenced by my quotes, read the secrets of the federal reserve by Eustace Mullins and come back to me.


"A great industrial nation is controlled by it's system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the world-- no longer a government of free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of small groups of dominant men." -- President Woodrow Wilson
 
Outlawstar said:
Its just not as cut and dried as powerful people clawing to the top like Bush as you say, Bush is a member of a secret society called teh skull and bones and so was his running mate carrey, and his father, and his father before, anyone who really thinks democracy still exists needs a swift history lesson into ancient royalty, royal bloodlinnes, and social darwinistic elites with delusions of grandeur.
I've never bought the secret society stuff. Just not enough evidence. Six degrees of separation can link anyone to anything. To my mind, people are members of these naff 'secret societies' because they are wealthy and powerful, they're not wealthy and powerful because they are in secret societies (which seem to be basically boys clubs where so called 'upstanding' people can get drunk and rowdy without garnering the negative media coverage, that's what most inside accounts seem to indicate).

Outlawstar said:
Also if you really think a One World Governments run as it will inevitably be by the likes of the puppets we have inn charge, than I completely unsmugly think you would benefit from more research, these are the people that keep Africa and other third World countries in debt, never allowinng them to rise up by design, perpetrating the Global Wrming hoax as another reason for the third world to STAY that way, , who have carried out THOUSANDS of illegal testing of killer chemiicals over unsuspecting populatins, like the illegal human uranium testing durinng the infamous Manhatton Project, or Project Shad, along with a host of others, the people who created Operation Northwoods, the people who knew about pearl harbour before it happened but let it happen, and thats just the half of it, you really want people like that running a world government, I DONT THINK SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH!!!
Now I agree with some of this, strongly disagree with other parts. Yes, Africa is being kept down by corporate interests in the West - mainly companies with no sense of social responsibility interested in plundering their natural resources for maximum profit. Yes, militaries of the world did test weapons on human subjects - however, certainly in developed countries, this practice has ended. Yes, it's highly likely the US allowed Pearl Harbor to happen in order that the outrage would push public opinion in favour of entering the war, which, perhaps not coincedentally helped America's economy to totally recover after the Great Depression. The parallels between Pearl Harbor and 9/11 are very easy to see as well - PNAC more or less spell that out. But as far as I can see, these things are not that connected except for having this same kind of ruthless, wealthy, clever person I mentioned above in charge of them.

The major conspiracy of the day is between oil companies and certain areas of the US government. That's the Bush connection, which has been fostered since George Bush Sr. founded Zapata Corporation and which culminated in the Iraq War.

But where I really have to disagree is this: Global Warming is not a hoax, and regarding it as one will utterly doom the human race. The people who stand to lose the most from switching to low carbon economies are these same people who are currently plundering Africa for it's natural resources, and engineering wars to gain control of these same resources. And it is they, their media friends and lobbyists who are the ones trying to convince people it is a hoax! And on top of that of course, there is all the scientific research and physical evidence you can actually see with your own eyes.

World Government run by these people may be a bad thing, but what other kind of person has ever run any country of the world? I think the foundation for a lot of the speculation on conspiracies is because it's usually a certain type of person who ends up in charge. Power corrupts, but it also attracts those who are already corrupt.
 
I've never bought the secret society stuff. Just not enough evidence. Six degrees of separation can link anyone to anything. To my mind, people are members of these naff 'secret societies' because they are wealthy and powerful, they're not wealthy and powerful because they are in secret societies (which seem to be basically boys clubs where so called 'upstanding' people can get drunk and rowdy without garnering the negative media coverage, that's what most inside accounts seem to indicate).

Okay Ill have to let our opinions split here, all Ill say is that you have just given me the classic descriptin of the so called secret societies as simple gentlemens clubs, fair enough but I wont get into a big debate about that here, all I can say is my opinion is teh polar opposite based on my research of such societies, and in fact my research indicates teh societies are seperate from governments in the sense that they dont attract rich men, they are powerfully backed interst groups that have literally infiltrated teh governments of the world through the banking system, just like the banks of Rotchsild completely bought up the economy for pennies on the dollar after teh deception at waterloo.

Now I agree with some of this, strongly disagree with other parts. Yes, Africa is being kept down by corporate interests in the West - mainly companies with no sense of social responsibility interested in plundering their natural resources for maximum profit. Yes, militaries of the world did test weapons on human subjects - however, certainly in developed countries, this practice has ended.

Now thats an irresponsible and naive statement, no offence intended but come on,are you really that naive?



Yes, it's highly likely the US allowed Pearl Harbor to happen in order that the outrage would push public opinion in favour of entering the war, which, perhaps not coincedentally helped America's economy to totally recover after the Great Depression. The parallels between Pearl Harbor and 9/11 are very easy to see as well - PNAC more or less spell that out. But as far as I can see, these things are not that connected except for having this same kind of ruthless, wealthy, clever person I mentioned above in charge of them.

Hmm, isint that a tad like doublethink, Im confused.

The major conspiracy of the day is between oil companies and certain areas of the US government. That's the Bush connection, which has been fostered since George Bush Sr. founded Zapata Corporation and which culminated in the Iraq War.

Okay but who owns the oil companies?

But where I really have to disagree is this: Global Warming is not a hoax, and regarding it as one will utterly doom the human race. The people who stand to lose the most from switching to low carbon economies are these same people who are currently plundering Africa for it's natural resources, and engineering wars to gain control of these same resources, and on top of that there is all the scientific research and physical evidence you can actually see with your own eyes.

Okay sorry I want to clarify that Man-Made global warming is a total fraud, and your wrong about the benefactors completely, and if you think disregarding global warming will doom the human race, youve abviously eaten up the doomsday predictions of highly paid spin artists.
The concept of using environmental catastrophe to control populations is an old one, and it has been posited to replace the need for war, thus teh need to destroy valuable infrastructure is lessened, Research the Club of Rome and their phony environmental institutions that they fund.


World Government run by these people may be a bad thing, but what other kind of person has ever run any country of the world? I think the foundation for a lot of the speculation on conspiracies is because it's usually a certain type of person who ends up in charge. Power corrupts, but it also attracts those who are already corrupt.
[/quote]

Right so well just give up, grand;)
 
Let's try and keep this civil eh? If you're going to call me out I need some kind of evidence to back it up - Tell me where and when, in developed countries, weapons have been tested on human subjects in the last 30 years. I'd also like to know which vested interests benefit from promoting the idea of Global Warming, and how. I'd rather not be given a reading list if possible, just the facts will do fine.

Well, you say it's bad to give up but there's a certain kind of person who fits the mould of 'ruler', and Machiavelli laid it out pretty well. If you aren't the most clever, the most ruthless, the most wealthy then there's always going to be someone to take your place. You don't get nice leaders. They'd quickly be stabbed in the back (literally or figuratively) and replaced. And that would happen no matter what kind of society you created.

Probably time to split this topic.
 
Let's try and keep this civil eh? If you're going to call me out I need some kind of evidence to back it up - Tell me where and when, in developed countries, weapons have been tested on human subjects in the last 30 years. I'd also like to know which vested interests benefit from promoting the idea of Global Warming, and how. I'd rather not be given a reading list if possible, just the facts will do fine



Hey I do apologize if I seemed uncivil, really, point taken.

Hmm Al Gore Carbon credits anyone, listen Ayase, you have to start thinking outside of financial gain here, you really do.



But listen, for real Listen chemical testing on unwilling human subjects is a fact, like I said look into uranium testing During teh Manhatton project, look into Project Shad,.they didint tell us then, why would they tell us now?
Listen all you have to do is look at the absolute poison present in our foods to see biological terrorism in todays world.



After 6,000 sheep died following the apparent release of a nerve agent at an Army facility in Utah in 1969, open-air testing was officially said to have ended in the US.

But the Defense Department’s April 2007 report to Congress on "Chemical and Biological Defense" strongly suggests an imminent resumption.

According to Francis A. Boyle, Professor of International Law at the University of Illinois College of Law and author of the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, at least three passages of the Pentagon’s 2007 report indicate a planned continuance of open-air testing. While one section of the document, for example, mentions the use of "live-CB-agent full system test chambers," another passage (page 67) reads: "More than thirty years have passed since outdoor live agent chemical tests were banned in the United States, and the last outdoor test with live chemical agent was performed, so much of the infrastructure for the field testing of chemical detectors no longer exists or is seriously outdated. The currently budgeted improvements in the T&E infrastructure will greatly enhance both the developmental and operational field testing of full systems, with better simulated representation of threats and characterization of system response."
As Dr. Boyle notes, both "test chambers" and "field testing" are mentioned in the report.

In addition, the passage says that improvements in the T&E (testing and evaluation) infrastructure and "better simulated representation of threats" are going to be carried out using "full systems" rather than simulants.

Dr. Boyle says, "It is clear they will be engaging in ‘Field Trials’ (not in test chambers) of ‘full systems,’ which means ‘live CB agents,’ not simulants."

Well, you say it's bad to give up but there's a certain kind of person who fits the mould of 'ruler', and Machiavelli laid it out pretty well. If you aren't the most clever, the most ruthless, the most wealthy then there's always going to be someone to take your place. You don't get nice leaders. They'd quickly be stabbed in the back (literally or figuratively) and replaced.
[/quote]

Yes and why does that happen, due to an uninformed public, a purposely uninformed public, come on now that you cant disagree with.
 
ayase said:
Yes, Africa is being kept down by corporate interests in the West - mainly companies with no sense of social responsibility interested in plundering their natural resources for maximum profit.
I don't really believe the issue lies in big bad corporations.

I believe there is an industry called "aid" in Africa. Any financial aid that is provided to third world countries is converted into food / medicine / etc which in turn is actually sold to the common population by those who were supposed to be distributing.

The "teach how to fish" is the key to take Africa from poverty, after all, how can Israel flourish if not by the use of technology and advanced techniques?
 
I don't really believe the issue lies in big bad corporations.

I believe there is an industry called "aid" in Africa. Any financial aid that is provided to third world countries is converted into food / medicine / etc which in turn is actually sold to the common population by those who were supposed to be distributing.

The "teach how to fish" is the key to take Africa from poverty, after all, how can Israel flourish if not by the use of technology and advanced techniques?
[/quote]

The big bad corporations are an important factor of course, I agree with your last point about learning to fish, though, frankly it WONT happen unless the elites see fit, that is a fact.All the aids in the world are in NO WAY reducing rates of death or starvation in Africa, most of these orginisations are nothing more than fronts funded by think-tanks who themselves are funded by the elites.
Makes me sick to my stomach.
 
Outlawstar said:
I don't really believe the issue lies in big bad corporations.

I believe there is an industry called "aid" in Africa. Any financial aid that is provided to third world countries is converted into food / medicine / etc which in turn is actually sold to the common population by those who were supposed to be distributing.

The "teach how to fish" is the key to take Africa from poverty, after all, how can Israel flourish if not by the use of technology and advanced techniques?

The big bad corporations are an important factor of course, I agree with your last point about learning to fish, though, frankly it WONT happen unless the elites see fit, that is a fact.All the aids in the world are in NO WAY reducing rates of death or starvation in Africa, most of these orginisations are nothing more than fronts funded by think-tanks who themselves are funded by the elites.
Makes me sick to my stomach.[/quote]
I've visited some parts in Brazil where the drought is pretty bad. Infant mortality is so bad, parents don't name their kids until they survived a couple years.

These areas received huge amounts of money from other richer states, but they never seem to improve. At some point, a NGO who was sending momey actually started to investigate what happened to the funds they've sent and realized those funds were actually being invested in BIG farms from rich politicians.

I've never been to Africa, but I'm pretty convinced that the same happens there. The big issue there is actually the corruption of those in a position to make a difference, not the so called lack of resources.

This is unrelated to Africa, but it's a recent article that shows how far corruption can go in the third world.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/8300079.stm

BTW - I've never seen that show.
 
chaos said:
ayase said:
Yes, Africa is being kept down by corporate interests in the West - mainly companies with no sense of social responsibility interested in plundering their natural resources for maximum profit.
I don't really believe the issue lies in big bad corporations.
Have to beg to differ there chaos:

http://www.hrw.org/legacy/reports/1999/nigeria/Nigew991-01.htm#P234_42143

Basically the mining and drilling companies in Africa don't give a **** about polluting, kicking out, paying terrible wages to, working to death and even colluding in killing members of the local communities who speak out against them. They want the Oil / Gas / Gold / Diamonds, and it's worth far more than the lives of a few African villagers to them.

outlawstar said:
ayase said:
Well, you say it's bad to give up but there's a certain kind of person who fits the mould of 'ruler', and Machiavelli laid it out pretty well. If you aren't the most clever, the most ruthless, the most wealthy then there's always going to be someone to take your place. You don't get nice leaders. They'd quickly be stabbed in the back (literally or figuratively) and replaced.
Yes and why does that happen, due to an uninformed public, a purposely uninformed public, come on now that you cant disagree with.
I don't necessarily disagree with the sentiment, but I don't know how much is uninformed and how much is just simple stupidity. Would people listen (or care) even if they were informed? Most people are gullible, most people are easy to control, so naturally someone is going to control them. We're back to 'We Want You Big Brother' again - people will find someone to follow, they'll follow the people who want to lead, and the people who want to lead are invariably bastards.

Things just don't seem to tally for me. Why would those in power want to test weapons on people if they were at the same time seeking to end war and control people instead through fear of Global Warming? And what, in your opinion, is the end goal of these parties? So they create a world government, they control all the wealth and wield absolute power... to what end? What do they actually want that is so terrible and isn't already going on in the world today?
 
Yes, Africa is being kept down by corporate interests in the West - mainly companies with no sense of social responsibility interested in plundering their natural resources for maximum profit.[/quote]
I don't really believe the issue lies in big bad corporations.[/quote]
Have to beg to differ there chaos:

http://www.hrw.org/legacy/reports/1999/nigeria/Nigew991-01.htm#P234_42143

Basically the mining and drilling companies in Africa don't give a **** about polluting, kicking out, paying terrible wages to, working to death and even colluding in killing members of the local communities who speak out against them. They want the Oil / Gas / Gold / Diamonds, and it's worth far more than the lives of a few African villagers to them.[/quote]

Very true.


I don't necessarily disagree with the sentiment, but I don't know how much is uninformed and how much is just simple stupidity. Would people listen (or care) even if they were informed? Most people are gullible, most people are easy to control, so naturally someone is going to control them. We're back to 'We Want You Big Brother' again - people will find someone to follow, they'll follow the people who want to lead, and the people who want to lead are invariably bastards.

Does it really matter which it is, to me its more about having the knowledge to make a choice based on actual facts, there is a sense of inevitablity about the system, but the same can be said about those who oppose it, and more and more people are.

Things just don't seem to tally for me. Why would those in power want to test weapons on people if they were at the same time seeking to end war and control people instead through fear of Global Warming? And what, in your opinion, is the end goal of these parties? So they create a world government, they control all the wealth and wield absolute power... to what end? What do they actually want that is so terrible and isn't already going on in the world today?
[/quote]


Wh would they, BECAUSE THEY ARE INSANE, literally psychotic, social darwinist, Eugenecist scum thats why, whats the endgame, okay seeing as youve asked, im my personal opinion, the ENDGAME, which by the way is teh title of an interesting movie on the subject, is to implement an orwellian world government, that is completely private owned to re-impose dark ages serfdom on the population, to control every single aspect of our lives, to destroy all sense of family and traditional values, they want all the power over new technologies that will allow them to live for long periods of time and go to the stars, oh and did I mention the plan to de-populate the planet to at least 1 billion.


Current stance, not neccesarily true, but based on 5 years of research, this is what Im getting, If you want to research the validity of such claims, Id be happy to reccomend you books.

And thats not even getting into the occult side of the elites, the ancient pagan beliefs they hold to be true, the logic of their social Darwinist tendencies that tell them that we deserve to die simply becasue they are where they are and we dont know it, this is all palin as day in the writings of their think tanks and agents.
 
ayase said:
chaos said:
ayase said:
Yes, Africa is being kept down by corporate interests in the West - mainly companies with no sense of social responsibility interested in plundering their natural resources for maximum profit.
I don't really believe the issue lies in big bad corporations.
Have to beg to differ there chaos:

http://www.hrw.org/legacy/reports/1999/nigeria/Nigew991-01.htm#P234_42143

Basically the mining and drilling companies in Africa don't give a **** about polluting, kicking out, paying terrible wages to, working to death and even colluding in killing members of the local communities who speak out against them. They want the Oil / Gas / Gold / Diamonds, and it's worth far more than the lives of a few African villagers to them.
Dont'get my wrong, I'm not saying they are not involved. But after reading your link I read corruption in almost every sentence. Procure firearms for the police? Involvement in politics? and so on...
 
Back
Top