Are we not allowed to provide our own input to whether the grapes were sour or if they were sweet instead, or maybe something else? Tasteless? Gooey?
I mean, how much value do you put on a fox's opinion on the matter? Well, they are stereotypically crafty, so some intelligence may be possessed.
For one thing, I do not specifically partake in the consumption of grapes. I do find them to be more like water balloons rather than fruits. Not really pleasant, but not disgusting either. Make them into wine, and I can give you a better idea - but even then, each bottle has a different blend of tastes from when it was a simple grape.
I think I appreciate other more talented artists rather than feel negative towards them. If anything, I'd like to make something as great as what they do - even when I'm concerned about how I create my work. There's a lot of things either unfinished or abandoned that I wanted to finish in the beginning. This is at the line-art stage of my drawings and hardly anything is coloured in. I've not even posted anything on DA for years, but I still draw.
But I can't take my folly and blame someone who works tooth-and-nail and get results.
I can see why someone would use a Twitch account to promote Paetron-backed play-throughs, but I watch a video to enjoy the reactions or trying to see how a game works. To the presenter, it's a job and a joy. Still, you chuck some coins at them for playing a game they had no part creating, but they make playing the game look great... Not to my taste, really - I'll keep the money so that I can play the game myself.
However, I would pay to support a Paetron if they are making something specific - a themed model, a unique set of pictures, an indie video that provides it's own experience. Kind of like if I did for Kickstarter. But I wouldn't pay for something that someone else is using as well.