And I would like people to stop twisting my words, or at the very least having hold of the wrong end of the stick. Let's see if I can sum up how people's brains work in a way everyone can understand:
Ugly = Do Not Want
Sexy = Do Want
Strong Woman + Ugly = Do Not Want Strong Women
Stong Woman + Sexy = Do Want Strong Women
This is why I'm in favour of strong female characters not being unattractive. Not "uber sexified wank fantasies" or whatever you want to call them, just marginally attractive. As I said earlier, I now realise that my idea of fanservice probably differs from a lot of people's. To me it was much less obvious stuff; just the odd bit of cheekiness rather than belting you over the head with enormous breasts.
I haven't watched any of these crap modern shows filled with over the top fanservice, so I can't really comment on them (other than to surmise that I'd probably hate them).
Jayme said:What I find odd when you originally posted, and still do, is that you don't want your characters to be attractive - when that is one of the most subjective and opinion-denominated ideas out there. There's nothing wrong with wanting your characters to be attractive, I don't personally consider someone from Clannad, Index or whatever else ilmaestro is watching attractive, but then, does that mean they are "ugly" characters? I could probably argue the cast of Shana or a Key adaptation are ugly in my opinion now, but that doesn't objectively mean they are such characters.
The characters in House of Five Leaves aren't... typical, but again, there's a charm to it. I wouldn't call them ugly. I wouldn't call them attractive either though.
vashdaman, I'm a Naruto apologist, but I wouldn't say that's a defining feature of her character. Not if I hadn't just googled right now anyway. She ain't no Orihime. (And even then, the design itself isn't... that striking).
I mean she's supposed to be a bloody Ninja, and not only that she's a ninja in what is basically a kids show! She's not supposed to be a pornstar who doesn't need the use of her back.
Rui said:Like Jayme I don't really want to stand here and defend Naruto of all series, but this does sort of annoy me.
I mean she's supposed to be a bloody Ninja, and not only that she's a ninja in what is basically a kids show! She's not supposed to be a pornstar who doesn't need the use of her back.
I find it disagreeable that the act of having breasts makes a person of questionable suitability to include in a kid show. Compared to the antics of Kakashi and Jiraiya, Hinata's irritating and calculated 'moe', and Naruto's own infamous 'oiroke no jutsu', Tsunade is a pretty weird target to single out. She's not even in the series that much, and if I were to pick a character trait that I would call out for Tsunade, her breast size would come long after her mindless gambling, her status or her penchant for punching things.
A lof of this anti-fanservice stuff seems to just be a backlash against female characters who actually have breasts, rather than other unattainable features such as a body designed to bait lolicon fans or a spineless, cutesy personality (pet hate). Merely having breasts isn't particularly sexy or fanservicey on its own. I'd say Faye Valentine is a lot more sexualised than Tsunade, even though it suits her; and I think of the two, Tsunade is the better character to aspire to be like. Not that I've ever really aspired to be like an anime female myself.
R
Jayme said:It's all relative, since there are three times as many men in Naruto. I never even consider her breasts, at all. Kishimoto's designs, by and large are all natural. And honestly, even though its drawn, if she's got it - "flaunt it". In its basic ideology, Naruto is quite western. It's setting might be an old Japan, but its storytelling and character work wouldn't be completely a miss in a western story. It's just an odd series to attack. The fact the girl can hold her own I do find far more important. If she didn't have breasts, she'd be more "loli" than anything. Breasts aren't important in his design, and might only be relevant when there's perverted Japanese nosebleed humor. Which is bad for the guys, not the girls.
What shows -do- you like? I haven't seen Trigun but I find it hard to believe it it doesn't contain any of the genre defining shonen tropes.
(The first part (re: attractiveness) I responded to was directed at ayase.)
I'm looking at this in a slightly detached manner, y'see. I think strong female characters who are sexy in the way a majority of men find attractive is a good thing because it helps shape social attitudes in a way which I would like to see them go. But - and here's the thing - I don't necessarily find the same things attractive as the vast majority of men. I find strong female characters attractive simply by virtue of *being* strong, female characters. The Revys and Motokos of the world would still be just as red hot to me if they had no curves, weighed a little more or wore jumpers and trousers. But I don't think they would be to a lot of people. I don't want to see strong female characters go back to what they were a long time ago (presented or viewed as being a negative thing) because of the sad, simple fact that being physically unattractive makes people less inclined to like you, no matter what other strengths you posses.Jayme said:What I find odd when you originally posted, and still do, is that you don't want your characters to be attractive - when that is one of the most subjective and opinion-denominated ideas out there. There's nothing wrong with wanting your characters to be attractive, I don't personally consider someone from Clannad, Index or whatever else ilmaestro is watching attractive, but then, does that mean they are "ugly" characters? I could probably argue the cast of Shana or a Key adaptation are ugly in my opinion now, but that doesn't objectively mean they are such characters.
Increased?, if anything it's gone down. There's nothing as bad as Jojo's Bizarre Adventure or any of Go Nagai's work in Jump! anymore.vashdaman said:Also I'm not really averse to all Shonen tropes either by any means, my main point was how I find the increased number of over sexualised, ojectified and unrepresentative female charcters unhealthy.
Reaper gI said:Increased?, if anything it's gone down. There's nothing as bad as Jojo's Bizarre Adventure or any of Go Nagai's work in Jump! anymore.vashdaman said:Also I'm not really averse to all Shonen tropes either by any means, my main point was how I find the increased number of over sexualised, ojectified and unrepresentative female charcters unhealthy.
Magazine is tame, as is Sunday. Dengeki Diaoh got better with Moeoh splitting off.
Shounen Ace is still entirely women with large breasts. Champion Red is still Champion Red, though allegedly authors have been asked to tone it down somewhat.
There's more anime that isn't shounen (seinen, novel or game adaptation) than there used to be. Most of that has tended to be more adult and fanservicy.
I'm looking at this in a slightly detached manner, y'see. I think strong female characters who are sexy in the way a majority of men find attractive is a good thing because it helps shape social attitudes in a way which I would like to see them go. But - and here's the thing - I don't necessarily find the same things attractive as the vast majority of men. I find strong female characters attractive simply by virtue of *being* strong, female characters. The Revys and Motokos of the world would still be just as red hot to me if they had no curves, weighed a little more or wore jumpers and trousers. But I don't think they would be to a lot of people. I don't want to see strong female characters go back to what they were a long time ago (presented or viewed as being a negative thing) because of the sad, simple fact that being physically unattractive makes people less inclined to like you, no matter what other strengths you posses.
lol, I only just noticed this when ayase quoted it in amongst all the tl;dr posts, you git.Jayme said:I don't personally consider someone from Clannad, Index or whatever else ilmaestro is watching attractive
ayase said:And I would like people to stop twisting my words, or at the very least having hold of the wrong end of the stick. Let's see if I can sum up how people's brains work in a way everyone can understand:
Ugly = Do Not Want
Sexy = Do Want
Strong Woman + Ugly = Do Not Want Strong Women
Stong Woman + Sexy = Do Want Strong Women