Review of The Ghost in the Shell: Deluxe Edition

[Ian Wolf]

“Cyberspace. A consensual hallucination experienced daily by billions of legitimate operators, in every nation, by children being taught mathematical concepts… A graphic representation of data abstracted from banks of every computer in the human system. Unthinkable complexity. Lines of light ranged in nonspace of the mind, clusters and constellations of data. Like city lights, receding…” – William Gibson

The new Ghost in the Shell film, made in America and to be released at the end of March, has already attracted plenty of comments. Most of this commentary is along the lines of: “How come they cast Scarlett Johansson as Major Motoko Kusanagi? This is whitewashing and racist!” or “*sigh* Oh no, not another attempt by the Yanks to make an anime adaptation.”

What is it with Hollywood and their seeming inability to adapt anything that isn’t American properly, especially when it comes to anime? Personally speaking, I have no problem with us in the west adapting stuff from Japan for our own audiences. Take The Seven Samurai – that was turned into a film set in the Wild West, and became The Magnificent Seven, a perfectly good film. The difference, however, is that they clearly changed the location and thus casting American actors in the roles was perfectly fine. The new Ghost in the Shell film fails to do this, at least from what we currently gather. It would be fine if they had set the film in the USA and changed the entire cast, but they haven’t. They still got Japanese actors to play other parts, including major roles, like Takeshi Kitano playing Chief Aramaki. If they can cast a Japanese actor as Aramaki, why not cast one for the Major? I don’t think I’m qualified to say if this is racist or not (excuse my cowardice), but I do feel that it is wrong.

If there is at least one good thing about the new film, it is that it gives everyone a chance to re-evaluate the original work. Manga Entertainment is re-releasing the films [[and the Stand Alone Complex TV series]] on both DVD and Blu-Ray on 20th March, and now Kodansha Comics have released “Deluxe Editions” of the original manga, in hardback and, for the first time, printed in the correct right-to-left unflipped format.

For those who are unfamiliar with the story, it takes place in the fictional floating Newport City in Shinhama Prefecture, and begins on 5th March, 2029. By this point in time, technology has become so advanced that people are able to possess “cyberbrains” that allow their bodies to interact with various networks. People can also gain various forms of prosthetics and even complete prosthetic bodies. The problem with all this technology is that you can be hacked and made to do things by whoever controls you.

The action follows Public Security Section 9, group of ex-military officers and members of the police who investigate crimes that normally involve the hacking of cyberbrains. They are led by Chief Daisuke Aramaki, who everyone always comments looks a bit like a monkey, while most of the main work is done by Major Motoko Kusanagi, who has undergone full-body prostheses.

There are some individual cases in this manga, but there is also the overriding case involving “The Puppeteer”, a criminal who is hacking into humans to commit a wide range of crimes. Major Kusanagi and Chief Aramaki attempt to get the bottom of these cases along with the other members of the team, including Batou, who is recognisable by his cylindrical cybernetic eyes; and Togusa, one of the few members of the team not to have any cybernetic enhancements. All the time, Kusanagi believes she able to solve the cases because of what her “ghost” is telling her, but what is her ghost? Is it a soul? Can someone so mechanical have a soul?

If you are confused by the plot, don’t worry: everyone seems to get confused by the plot of Ghost in the Shell. It and Akira are two of the most cyberpunk manga/anime around, and two of the hardest to get your head around. It is made even harder by the inclusion of loads of notes in the margins of the pages. If you turn to the back of the book, it even gives you a note of caution saying: “This book contains a great number of margin notes and commentary. If read alongside the narrative, this may cause confusion and interrupt the flow of the story, so it is recommended that they be enjoyed separately.” You know when some people tell you to read a book twice because you might miss all the hidden references and jokes in it? With Ghost in the Shell you have to read it twice to make sense of everything.

Also, because it was written in 1989, it has dated badly in some places. This is a story with all kinds of futuristic technology, but also one in which the Soviet Union still exists. There also appear to have been some problems with translation. At one point, a Tachikoma (an intelligent tank) says to Kusanagi: “We demand the use of use of natural oil!” It is odd that this error has occurred, especially when you compare it to Dark Horse’s release of the manga in 2004, which has the line correctly written as: “We demand the use of natural oil!”

Where Ghost in the Shell really stands out, however, is the artwork. Now, it should be mentioned that the quality of the art does vary. For example, sometimes it looks like Batou’s eyes are a bit out of place. But on the other side, especially when you get to the colour pictures, the artwork looks brilliant. The shading and the details all look wonderful, and the characters are also great in colour, especially Kusanagi. This does lead to one of the issue that some readers might have, which is that creator Shirow Masamune is someone who is also known for doing erotic art, and thus a few of the outfits worn by the female characters may be a bit too revealing for some tastes. Put it this way: it appears that in Masamune’s vision of the future, nurses are more than willing to wear uniforms that show off their sexy knickers.

However, arguably the fact that you are not seeing something even sexier is worse. A quick bit of research is enough to show you that Kodansha have made some changes. At the beginning of the third chapter, we see a swimsuit-clad Kusanagi on holiday on a boat. We see her jumping into it with two women already on board, also in swimsuits, waiting for her. At least that is what you see in the Kodansha version. If you read the 2004 Dark Horse version, you see that Kusanagi and the other two women are in fact naked. Not only are they naked, the two women already on the boat are having sex, and Kusanagi is about to join in, which she does in the Dark Horse version. What then follows are two pages of a raunchy, lesbian threesome, in colour – at least in Dark Horse’s copy.

In Kodansha’s “Deluxe Edition”, a title which should at least imply that it includes all of the manga, they not only put clothes on the women and moved the characters so they sit separately rather than making love, they removed two entire pages of the book. Now, if they were doing this because they were trying to make the manga more accessible to the public by getting it down to a 16+ rating for example I can at least understand the reasoning even though I would disapprove. Yet Kodansha’s version still has a 18+ “Mature” rating. If the manga is still being aimed only at adults, why censor anything? It serves no purpose.

When I was writing up the conclusion to this review I was going to argue that while there are many reasons to not buy Ghost in the Shell – including the varying quality of the art, some errors made in translation, the difficulty in understanding the plot, the fact that it is not the most feminist story out there in the way some women are depicted, and also the issue of it dating badly in certain places – it was still worth investing in. After all, it is a rare release of a hardback manga, it is now finally in the correct right-to-left format, the wonderful quality of the colour pages outweighs some of the dodgier segments, the chance to see the earliest origins of one of the most famous characters in all of manga, and then there is the biggest reason of all – it gives you a chance to enjoy the Major as she should be enjoyed, before Scarlett Johansson has any chance to potentially spoil things.

However, the censorship tipped me over the edge. Not only are there all the other issues, but Kodansha made this stupid decision to cut out a bit of the story. Yes, it doesn’t add anything to the plot, but the fact they felt the need to do this is just wrong, especially when it serves no purpose at all. This has made me so angry as to change my view, to get rid of my defence of this new book. I originally want to say “read it before the Yanks ruin it”. Kodansha have already ruined it for me.

The worst manga I have ever reviewed is Cardfight!! Vanguard, which I principally hated because it was too commercial among other reasons. Only the artwork prevented me from giving it a 1 out of 10. I think The Ghost in the Shell: Deluxe Edition may well tie with it. The only things saving it are the colour artwork, and that it’s in hardback, it’s unflipped and the Major is so iconic as a character. However, publishing a book in hardback is not a difficult thing to do; the unflipped nature of the manga is just something we now expect, unlike back in 2004 when flipping was more commonplace; and removal of the sex scene also removes another major aspect of Kusanagi as a character, in that this scene clearly proves she is also an LGBT character.

In conclusion, you can cope with it being flipped. Save your money and get the older, paperback Dark Horse version instead.

Quick Information


Title: The Ghost in the Shell: Deluxe Edition
Publisher: Kodansha Comics
Genre: Crime, Cyberpunk, Sci-fi
Author(s): Shirow Masamune
Type: Manga
Original vintage: 1989
Format: Book (digital edition available)
Language options:
Age rating: 18
Material length in pages: 352
Score (out of 10): 2

Continue reading...

 

[ayase]

The new Ghost in the Shell film, made in America and to be released at the end of March, has already attracted plenty of comments. Most of this commentary is along the lines of: “How come they cast Scarlett Johansson as Major Motoko Kusanagi? This is whitewashing and racist!” or “*sigh* Oh no, not another attempt by the Yanks to make an anime adaptation.”

And those were just me.

It's frankly ridiculous and unnecessary to be censoring like this in this day and age. Good job calling it out Ian, I had no idea they'd done this. I'll stick with my DH versions. I also can't see anyone whose opinion is worth listening to putting this book down because of sexy ladies - Shirow might be an erotic artist but he still writes women who are strong and capable (this seems to be something common to a lot of similarly minded creators, admiration for women as people as well as the female form often goes hand in hand) so the fact they're also attractive shouldn't really detract from that.

 

[Smeelia]

I wonder how people would feel if the Major was played by a male actor, her body is artificial anyway so her appearance isn't fixed. I can understand people's concerns about the film but ideas along those lines are exactly what these kind of cyberpunk settings are good at exploring, it seems a shame that people would focus on the surface aspects when that could get in the way of interesting storylines.

Along similar lines, censoring the manga is pretty horrible and I can't think of a single decent excuse for it.

 

[Joe]

Sorry, but I'm of the opinion that it's hardly censorship worth getting worked up about when the author himself decided that a 2-page scene of a lesbian orgy that adds nothing to the story should be removed. It sucks I guess that a physical "deluxe" edition isn't technically the "complete" version, but nothing of value is really lost here. If you want to get your rocks off (which is the only purpose for that scene), you can find it online pretty easily.

 

[ayase]

Sorry, but I'm of the opinion that it's hardly censorship worth getting worked up about when the author himself decided that a 2-page scene of a lesbian orgy that adds nothing to the story should be removed.

When those pages were removed from the Studio Proteus/Dark Horse version (which pre-dates the uncensored DH omnibus) it was apparently because Shirow "was sick of taking flak for the pages" which doesn't sound so much like he wanted to, but rather caved under pressure from idiots. Which granted, he shouldn't have done and is somewhat weak for doing (and he should instead have inserted more nudity just to piss those annoying kinds of people off more and bathed in their delicious impotent rage) but still.

 

[Smeelia]

I tend to think that the creator doesn't really have any more right to change things than anyone else, I suppose that's maybe partly a side effect of being a Star Wars fan. Having said that, I don't think the idea of alternative versions is inherently wrong but making changes and pretending they didn't happen is a bad way to go about it. I don't know if calling it a "Deluxe Edition" is enough to clearly notify readers that this is an alternative version with different content.

As for the "value" of the changed content, that's kind of subjective. As mentioned, the changed scene has implications about the characters and that could be highly significant to certain readers. To go back to that Star Wars reference, I found that changes to the actors for certain scenes in later editions significantly reduced my enjoyment of those versions compared to the original. People will have their own views about what changes matter to them and which version they prefer but it's not fair to suggest that some of those opinions are wrong (unless we're still talking Star Wars, in which case anyone who likes the changes is wrong and Han shot first).

 

[Professor Irony]

It's all very well saying people should go out and buy the Dark Horse edition, but that thing is changing hands for exorbitant prices now. Believe me, I've looked.

 

[Joe]

As for the "value" of the changed content, that's kind of subjective. As mentioned, the changed scene has implications about the characters and that could be highly significant to certain readers. To go back to that Star Wars reference, I found that changes to the actors for certain scenes in later editions significantly reduced my enjoyment of those versions compared to the original. People will have their own views about what changes matter to them and which version they prefer but it's not fair to suggest that some of those opinions are wrong (unless we're still talking Star Wars, in which case anyone who likes the changes is wrong and Han shot first).

Sure, it's technically subjective, but the dialogue has no importance to the plot (as stated by Masamune himself: "The dialogue on those pages is of no importance, story-wise"), and about the only thing you could possibly gleam about the characters from this scene is "the Major likes sex", which, granted I haven't read the manga, but I'm pretty sure you could figure out that same detail from elsewhere in the work.

The scene is just bad, non-explicit porn. It doesn't offer anything of value in regards to the plot or characters, and people are so quick to scream muh censorship rather than take the alternative (granted, also subjective) view of the author improving on the work. If people are a little miffed that something was removed, that's understandable, but to get so upset over something that is so inconsequential to the work as a whole just baffles me.

As an aside, regarding the topic of self-censorship/authorial post-release edits, people always predictably bring up the (granted, genuinely terrible) changes Lucas made to Star Wars, but usually fail to provide examples where this was generally considered beneficial to the work, such as Blade Runner.

 

[Smeelia]

It's still subjective, people get to decide for themselves what's good or bad about a work as well as what's important and what isn't important. Even the author doesn't have the right to decide for them, some people may choose to defer to the author's judgement but that's still their choice.

It's also worth noting that the changes were clearly important enough to the people involved in the release to make them in the first place. If the people making the release considered it important then it shouldn't be suprising that it might similarly matter to those who may be interested in the release.

I expect Star Wars tends to get mentioned because it's well known and more likely to be personally relevant. Even with Star Wars, I expect there are some people who are happy with at least some of the changes (presumably at least some of the people involved in making those changes). I may joke, but their opinions aren't any less valid even if they're going against a more widely held view.

 

[ayase]

granted I haven't read the manga

But apparently know enough about it to state:

The scene is just bad, non-explicit porn. It doesn't offer anything of value in regards to the plot or characters

Why is it bad, if you don't mind me asking? Also I'm not sure what your categorisation for explicit porn is if fully nude fingering doesn't cut it. There are plenty of films and other media with sex scenes which could be considered unnecessary, but if you remove everything unnecessary from all stories you could probably cut them all to a dozen pages in length. Is it just sex that should be cut from stories for being unnecessary? If so what would be the reason for that? Isn't sex as much a part of life and the human experience as anything else? I like to think of myself as a sex positive person, and yes, it does legitimately annoy me when things like this are cut as it seems to me to be about enforcing a particular western (specifically American) anti-sex morality on media when violence (which I think is actually much worse than sex, but don't have any problem with it existing in the realm of fiction) is apparently fine.

 

[Joe]

Also I'm not sure what your categorisation for explicit porn is if fully nude fingering doesn't cut it.

Non-explicit in the sense that genitals are obscured.

But apparently know enough about it to state:

The scene is just bad, non-explicit porn. It doesn't offer anything of value in regards to the plot or characters

I haven't read the manga as a whole, but I read that chapter after learning about the hubbub surrounding it. It starts with Batou in the middle of a stakeout being told by Aramaki to call in the Major, who's currently on leave for some R&R. Then it cuts to her having a lesbian threesome on a boat. Batou tells her to come in, she leaves somewhat annoyed. Six pages that could've easily been cut down to a fraction of that.

Why is it bad, if you don't mind me asking? There are plenty of films and other media with sex scenes which could be considered unnecessary, but if you remove everything unnecessary from all stories you could probably cut them all to a dozen pages in length. Is it just sex that should be cut from stories for being unnecessary? If so what would be the reason for that? Isn't sex as much a part of life and the human experience as anything else? I like to think of myself as a sex positive person, and yes, it does legitimately annoy me when things like this are cut as it seems to me to be about enforcing a particular western (specifically American) anti-sex morality on media when violence (which I think is actually much worse than sex, but don't have any problem with it existing in the realm of fiction) is apparently fine.

I also consider myself a fairly sexually liberal person, but in terms of sex scenes that don't actually contribute anything to a work, I can take them or leave them. I should be clear, I don't object to the scene being there. I just don't understand why people are legitimately angry at it's excision. The scene being there or not makes no difference because the scene doesn't contribute anything. It's there for literally no other reason than at the time, Masamune wanted a raunchy lesbian sex scene.

 

[Smeelia]

The scene might not contribute anything to your interpretation of the work but it does contribute to the interpretations of others. It is a part of the work and is as open to be engaged with as any other part of the work. There are a few examples above of why the scene might be important to some, people might feel it has relevance to the characters, to the world building, to the atmosphere, to the themes or anything else. Some people might well enjoy it purely in an erotic context, there's nothing wrong with that either. There's no objective measure to demonstrate that one interpretation is superior to another, so there aren't any "right" or "wrong" interpretations.

You might not understand why other people care about a particular scene but that doesn't mean they're wrong to care about it. You're quite entitled not to care about the scene yourself but to tell others that they shouldn't is wrong.

 

[Rui]

The link to the article really made it sound as though it was removed under duress which doesn't really come off as being something the creator originally wanted at all. The fact that the character is also attracted to women and liberal about sex could have been established in a less provocative way, sure, but the fact is that it wasn't and removing the scene does slightly alter these themes. In an otherwise-pure series I'd probably agree that a single raunchy (yet nice and consensual) scene could be unnecessary, however I think it's fair to assume fans of GitS and/or Shirow are likely to enjoy a dollop of fan service now and then. A shame it was cut.

R