Lawrence said:
Auditions for a place on the podcast were held fairly, giving an equal opportunity to all, you full well know that since you took part. What was important was who was right for the 'cast and not where they came from.
More over, there are some pretty stunning voices at work in the cast.
It's not like there was an open invite to anyone who wanted to take part in the forum discussion, or anything.
Held fairly? Ha, yeah okay then
Being called the Namaka Britannica Podcast doesn’t change the fact that 2/3 of the podcasters are from 1 part of the UK, being that the podcast is created by AUKN users it would stand to reason that discriminating between one part of the UK and another would only prove to be foolish of the part of those who decided the whole thing.
Spyro (for an example) was more than eager to contribute to the podcast and I find it wrong that 2 people from Scotland and 1 person from England but lives in germany was the outcome and is seen as the equal way of doing things. Members across the UK that took part in the chats prior to the actual podcast début should have been taken into consideration of where they are geographically and 1 person from each region should have been elected for the role. If nobody from Ireland applied then only the parts of the UK that did apply should have been taken into consideration – 1 from England, 1 from wales and 1 from Scotland.
Rui said:
Does it only qualify as a UK podcast if there is a member from every UK country?
Well yes, because if the countries where separate entities and not part of the United Kingdom (the clue is in the title/name) then having 2 people from 1 seperate country and another who was born british but lives in another country now wouldn’t be a problem. The fact it is affiliated with the UK means that by not representing 1 person from each part of a United kingdom will be unequal and as a result can be classified as both discrimination and racist.
Rui said:
Does it also have to make sure it accurately represents other strata of society, with all sexualities, ages, social classes and religious backgrounds spoken for?
Sexuality, age, religion are not the topic; equal geographical representation is.
For the record, as no doubt there will be some that think i am attacking this due to not being a podcaster or whatever else reasoning they can assume, I officially pulled out of the dealings way before the podcast debut. There’s no motive other than equality.