With the prices they charge for downloads versus the second hand discs which make up 90% of my current games library, they'd bloody well better have physical media drives. Saying that, if it gets to the point where I have to download games, I will. I just might not be paying for them.kupocake said:I'm certain that two generations from now, consoles won't even have media drives, and if the next gen don't, it really won't surprise me.
Where did you read that? Although obviously Nintendo are by far the most likely to "hold out" on download services.Stuart-says-yes said:Also the next gen Nintendo console, will run on holographic disks as they can hold up to 4-6 TB, which is way more than you can download in a day.
ilmaestro said:This, to my mind, is *nuts*.Sparrowsabre7 said:I'd also never buy a 2d animation in blu ray as I mentioned on the Manga cancelling FMAB Blu topic.
I can't decide what's more wrong - thinking that there is more detail in special effects than there is in the *real world*, or thinking that animation drawn in "HD" somehow doesn't benefit from being reproduced at the original resolution.
Please, please believe me when I say you must simply have not been in the right environment, or had the right source materials, to see the benefit that HD can bring to animation.
Jayme said:The '90s Simpsons compared to now has absolutely NOTHING to do with it being in HD. It's Groening loving his characters to be on-model, all the time and the recent animator changes that do it. Just compared the original opening to the HD one and you can see how boring they look - Marge's head turn at the grocery store is a big difference to her original heart-pumping hair flip. If they put the original '90s episodes in HD, it'd be bloody spectacular.
You have it totally backwards. When you see live action films in HD, you realize how much more "real" it looks, whereas when you see SFX in HD you realize how much more "fake" they look. HD *exposes* SFX, even the best ones, and only serves to draw out more detail in real world locations.Sparrowsabre7 said:I'm not saying there is more detail in special effects, but special effects benefit more from being HD I think, it makes them look better. If the real world is vaguely fuzzy, it still looks real, if special effects look fuzzy it can make them look less real.
ilmaestro said:You have it totally backwards. When you see live action films in HD, you realize how much more "real" it looks, whereas when you see SFX in HD you realize how much more "fake" they look. HD *exposes* SFX, even the best ones, and only serves to draw out more detail in real world locations.Sparrowsabre7 said:I'm not saying there is more detail in special effects, but special effects benefit more from being HD I think, it makes them look better. If the real world is vaguely fuzzy, it still looks real, if special effects look fuzzy it can make them look less real.
DanM said:I just buy dvd's, that way i know i can play it downstairs, in my room, or take them round to a friends house. I've only ever bought one blu-ray (ponyo) to try it out on my brothers PS3, and i can't say i noticed the difference.
Godot said:DanM said:I just buy dvd's, that way i know i can play it downstairs, in my room, or take them round to a friends house. I've only ever bought one blu-ray (ponyo) to try it out on my brothers PS3, and i can't say i noticed the difference.
On first reading, I read that as "Porno" xD