Maxon said:Original? No.
2006 remake? Hell yeah!
Well seeing as the first one sucked, it's safe to say they're different without even seeing the second version.Ark said:I haven't seen the newer version but I'd be amazed if it was that different from the older which was a very evil show.
Evil? Heh.Ark said:I haven't seen the newer version but I'd be amazed if it was that different from the older which was a very evil show.
Maxon said:The only bad comments I've heard come from those that are fanboys of the original. It would seem like I'm a 2006 remake fanboy, but bear in mind I saw the original first.
The remake is a lot more faithful to the game. It has the same soundtrack and the animation is top notch. The characters have a lot more depth simply because we get to know them more thanks to the series being twice as long as the original. Its atmosphere sucks you in and it could give Air a run for its money when it comes to heartbreak and tragedy.
Well seeing as the first one sucked, it's safe to say they're different without even seeing the second version.Ark said:I haven't seen the newer version but I'd be amazed if it was that different from the older which was a very evil show.
Um, why? Are you allergic to melodrama by any chance?Ark said:I was definately unable to physically look at the screen on at least one occasion.
Ramadahl said:Um, why? Are you allergic to melodrama by any chance?Ark said:I was definately unable to physically look at the screen on at least one occasion.
Ramadahl said:Um, why? Are you allergic to melodrama by any chance?Ark said:I was definately unable to physically look at the screen on at least one occasion.
Nyu said::lol: there is no fluff in 2006.
Ark said:Nyu said::lol: there is no fluff in 2006.
So no baby fox girls and singing alarm clocks?
Damn, my condolences man .Ark said:I'm allergic to pornographic fluff and what I saw was fluff at its most fluffy and pornographic.
Not really, sounds like a fair enough reason not to watch something if you flat-out don't like the artwork (I assume you mean the art?).Sami said:Is it bad to say...the animation really put me off watching it?
Ramadahl said:Hmm, while I guess you could say there was fluff in a sort of slice-of-life way,
Ramadahl said:I never noticed anything pornographic. And by "never noticed", I mean I'm pretty darn sure there was absolutely nothing pornographic in it whatsoever.
Ark said:Ramadahl said:Hmm, while I guess you could say there was fluff in a sort of slice-of-life way,
You call transforming fox girls and disembodied souls slice-of-life? Where do you live?
Ramadahl said:I never noticed anything pornographic. And by "never noticed", I mean I'm pretty darn sure there was absolutely nothing pornographic in it whatsoever.
I mean pornographic in terms of being highly explicit. Like some people said the violence in Passion of the Christ was pornographic.
Jayme said:Ark said:Ramadahl said:Hmm, while I guess you could say there was fluff in a sort of slice-of-life way,
You call transforming fox girls and disembodied souls slice-of-life? Where do you live?
Ramadahl said:I never noticed anything pornographic. And by "never noticed", I mean I'm pretty darn sure there was absolutely nothing pornographic in it whatsoever.
I mean pornographic in terms of being highly explicit. Like some people said the violence in Passion of the Christ was pornographic.
Seriously never heard people use Pornographic when its offensive, Cos doesn't that mean you would get people saying "Im listening to a Pornographic CD" and shiz like that.