And, of course, your argument is perfectly logical isn't it? Because when you more or less said that Square Enix delayed FFXII because it wanted to focus on spin-offs, that made sense, didn't it? When you said that it wasn't the leap to next generation that would make FFXIII take a long time to be developed, but it was the focus on spin-offs and remakes, that was really logical wasn't it?
Please, kupoartist, stop with the stupid attempts to "translate" what I say into something that makes you seem superior - because while other people have made good points against Square Enix, you most certainly have not and I grow bored with your futile attempts at undermining Square Enix, k? 
As for original IP, you have Last Remnant and It's A Wonderful World. Even if Square weren't making remakes and spin-offs, they wouldn't be making any more original IPs. Last year, you has Radiata Stories and Code Age is still on the way. There's plenty of originally titled games from Square Enix.
So why get rid of these spin-offs that I, and obviously (judging from the reaction of the people on Kotaku) want?
But ... no one is denying that Square Enix are making lots of remakes and spin-offs.
This is the thing, Square did take risks in the past. They took a huge risk on the Spirits Within film, and that completely bankrupted Square Pictures, lost them Sakaguchi and meant they had to merge with Enix. When you get that badly burnt by a risk, then it would be understandable if that company never took another risk again! But, Square have still continued to take risks - Drakengard, making FFIII for DS even when DS's future was in doubt, Last Remnant, It's A Wondeful World, Radiate Stories and re-imagining Final Fantasy for FFXII. These are all sizable risks, and Square took them. I think people are very unfair to Square Enix sometimes.
btw: Kingdom Hearts wasn't really a risk. Disney characters and Final Fantasy characters? It was pretty much a guaranteed success, really.
