ayase said:I'll agree with you on the less moralistic stance taken WRT both heroes and villains in Anime (hence my decision to include protagonists in my choices, and Fuse from Jin-Roh is an excellent example of this) but I would go on to say that it makes the villains better characters when you can understand them to some degree - ie: they're not just "baddies".Ark said:My point is it's hard to really talk about villains within the Japanese context because they have a view of life that's much less moralistic.
There are well developed antagonists in anime but they aren't necessarily good villains. For example I'd say that the protagonist of Jin-Roh is as much a villain as the antagonists if not a actually a better villain.
The best characters are always those who's morals are shades of grey, not black and white (because that's most realistic) and while this does make it hard to differentiate, it's not impossible. Things such as killing innocent civilians, or using force where diplomacy would work are classic villainous attributes which most people's moral compasses (regardless of factors such as religious belief) wouldn't be able to justify.
I hear this arguement a lot in debates about politics and history and it really doesn't win me over. There are times when there is a reasonable choice between a bad and a worse option but within certain contexts it can become a completely ammoral choice.
Likewise in certain contexts the term villain becomes meaningless and should be replaced with anatagonist (if that's even appropriate). What's the point of calling Fuse from Jin-Roh a villain when everyone else is just as bad?