Search results

Is there no-one on this planet that you love?

I actually really hope you can re-discover the sheer wonder of the mere fact we are existing, the fact we are even here, the fact we have senses , we can experience amazing things, we can live, we can love, we can laugh, we do not need laughter to survive, but its there my friend, teh universe...

It is quite elitist actually and its exactly that kind of thinking in both a religious and political sense that has incited more death than any other ideologies in human history, people are not idiots, they are just un-informed, Im not implying Im some all knowing informed being here, just...

There is a difference, this invloves science, its a tabgible issue, not a moral or ethical one, a decision does not have to me made in this cae, until the science is undebatable, which it absolutely is not, why people dont understand this I just dont know.

I think the only question here is, is the lie worth telling to get people doing what they should already be doing. I think so. I must disagree here, thats the kind of rhetoric a fascist/communist government pulls to justify its outwardly heinous acts.

Likewise! I apologise, what I meant to say more clearly is these are the scientists the IPCC and UN cite with a large body of their publications and are heavily affiliated with them, it is one o the top climate research centres in the world, stop tip-toeing around the issue now please...

My point is that global warming by human activity in relation to co2 is not settled science, it is not a consensus, it should therefore not be used as an excuse to tax and police the public, especially in this economic state of affairs.

There are respected climatologsts on that list too, the founder of the weather channel in America tried to sue Al Gore as he was against AGW, the debate is NOT over, that is my point and that cannot be denied!

Im all for making the climate better, but regulating life giving co2 aint gonna do that, water vapour is a far more potent greenhouse gas than co2. It was changed because the globe is not warming anymore, simple as that in my humble opinion. A war on terrorism and a war on climate change...

Thats nothing compared with what we can really do with the climate, we can seed clouds to create rain in the 60s, just think about what we can do now, the un in 1977 forbid weather warfare, you dont forbid something unless its possible, this is the other side of the whole debate, the technology...

ernational agreements on real issues instead of freaking co2? Freaking CO2 is an issue... Cause for global warming or not, it is a major issue as it causes acid rain. The oceans are responsible for purifying the air, not forests. Algae and other microorganisms purify a lot more the air than...

I did read it thank you very much, the title says its growing, it doesint say we are doing it?

When did I say we are making them grow?

By either slowing it down or speeding it up? Which is it? There is no evidence for either of these things, how could we be making them grow out of interest?

Look, the ice caps have grown and shrunk in the past, obviously they do so during the winter and summer months, but even more dratically in the past than now, and let me tell you it was nothing to do with Viking SUVs. There is nothing unnatural about it, I dont see what the panic is about!

The icecaps are not melting unaturally and are actually increasing on average!! http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,517035,00.html

I dont see where youd get the idea I dont listen to people to be honest! Yes thats all well and good, and they are real issues, so why arent we reaching international agreements on real issues instead of freaking co2? THEY ARE, hundreds of scientists and politicians have been debating it for...

Fair enough, thats how I interpreted it though. Luckily for me there is evidence for everything Ive ever mentioned, so it is not in any way religious thank you very much. Well, show me them then. Show me respectable papers of record like the Times of London, or the New York Times or The...

Thanks for opening with the usual dig at my character :D From my knowledge youve never proven me wrong on anything Ive said, but hey thats just crazy old me talking. As for your second point, just the fact that your still thinking in terms of the left-right paradigm tells me enough about...