Higurashi: When They Cry (2020) Episode 14


Student Council President
Good episode. We did get to see Ooishi's killing spree. This might sound weird, but it was less awful than I expected (still awful mind you). Personally I think it would've been better to leave it (mostly) implied. On the other hand it gives us some clear information. And there's a lot to unpack. What I gather from it:
  • Ooishi most likely killed Keiichi (using the bat)
  • Ooishi killed due to Hinamizawa Syndrome
  • Satoko did actually go with Keiichi to her house (and returned to the festival after witnessing the murder)
  • Ooishi's gun seems to have more bullets than physically possible? Or did he reload that thing one-handed?
Now the big question is how and who "induced" the syndrome in him?

The rest of the episode gives us a lot more insight in Rika's actions. And to be frank, I'm quite disappointed that all Rika did were the small interventions we've seen. Now I get that she is intimately familiar with the fragments and she did what would normally be sufficient. But I simply don't buy that from that point onward you'd not go the extra mile to monitor the whole situation. And even if that would happen the first time, you'd be doubly caution from thereon. Remember, she's pulled back into this nightmare again, Hanyuu hardly has any power left and in the first iteration, all she did was say some words to Keiichi. Even worse is that in the second iteration she was simply "surprised" they hadn't found the body of Tomitake yet.

But alas, that was the approach she took. And now she's lost Hanyuu for good it seems. The existence of the sword that can end the life of those "looping" is a new one.
The sword seems to be the one that was used to kill Hanyuu. In the manga it was depicted the same way, shape and all.
This episode clearly made it seem as a means of "escaping" for Rika, which, given her situation, isn't all that strange. However, to me it immediately gave off another signal, this "sword" will come in handy later on. In other words, someone (or something?) is also looping. The sword being gone could also mean that the "enemy" might poses this weapon as well. This does beg the question, why it wasn't used before on Rika. There are several possible reasons:
  • The one in possession of the sword isn't aware of it's power
  • The one in possession of the sword is another "looper" offing him-/herself, but due to Rika looping gets brought back (as Rika's loop is bigger)?
  • The one in possession of the sword can only use it once Hanyuu is gone
  • The one in possession of the sword isn't aware that Rika is his/her target
  • Someone is saving Rika by killing her(?) before the enemy does. As a result, Rika's death continues to be unconnected to the other murders/deaths. (Where Ooishi killing Rika breaks this trend)
Rika giving herself 5 more attempts felt a bit random, but it does sort of make sense to set a boundary.

Also I guess I will post one of my theories here as well
Interesting theory, but as you've also stated... unlikely.
One key element I think we both agree on. The antagonist must be someone with knowledge about the previous iterations. It's highly unlikely that without this knowledge Rika could've been fooled so easily. I'd argue the naming of the arcs "...-deceiving" is also indicative of this. It appears to be one arc, while ending up to be different and presumably very different under the hood.

The only way I could see someone without prior knowledge pulling this off, would be to wait till Rika made her move and then start your own plan. The only problem is that Rika's moves are in and off themselves very small and seemingly inconsequential. Whispering something in Keiichi's ear to ensure he gifts a doll to Mion, is not something any random person would perceive as "a move".

The other way would be that it's just "coincidence" and while there's no real counter for that, it would be a massive disappointment. So disregarding that option, our antagonist really must have prior knowledge.

Rika, Hanyuu or any derived entity of either of them would do. At one point I speculated Frederica Bernkastel (not the witch Bernkastel) for the exact same reason of needing to know the arcs intimately to "deceive" Rika. (discussion thread for episode 7). Wanting to tie it to the witch Bernkastel (and thus to Umineko) still seems to fall flat for most of the same reasons. But disregarding this tie, she could do it.

But as fitting as it would be, I have the feeling it must be someone else. It could either be one person (possibly a looper) that operates on the meta level as well. Or, the meta level representation differs from the in-world one. Regardless, I think it should be someone we already know (although, possibly only by name/mention). If it would be some completely random and new entity, then that sort of ruins the Mystery of the story. Not to mention that it would still need a very good explanation of how that entity gained the knowledge needed to pull this off and a convincing motive.

On the subject of connecting things to Umineko. Some people like the theory that Hanyuu is Featherine. One key argument is the damaged "memory device", where the damage seems to align with the crack on Hanyuu's left horn. Now it could be coincidence, but when talking about granting Rika the ability to remember who killed her, the camera focused on Hanyuu's damaged horn, emphasizing the link between memory and her horns(?).

Now we could go on and speculate that Higurashi is thus a game board with Featherine (as Hanyuu) as the game master, but due to the damage to her memory device, not aware of the full scope. The original story of Higurashi then occurs, where Rika and Hanyuu focus on "escaping". However, the real goal of the game board might not have been the survival of Rika. This aligns with Lambdadelta's description of Bernkastel's past that the gamemaster lost sight of the goal. It could very well be that the game board hasn't been solved, which caused Rika to be pulled back in without knowing how to truly escape. But there'd still be two big hurdles: Firstly, how will this translate to a timespan of centuries as opposed to the 100 years and counting at this point. Especially now Rika seems set on only giving it five more attempts and having a means to "give up". Secondly, where is the "ill will" of Hanyuu and where is the "logic error".

There are two further things that I find noteworthy, but don't have any concrete theories on:
  1. Satoko remains suspicious if you ask me. For some reason she fails to stay alive in every iteration. More often than not she dies in inexplicable and seemingly unconnected ways.
  2. How does Rika loop exactly? I was always under the impression that this was directly done by Hanyuu, and with Hanyuu's decreasing power, the time Rika had per iteration was becoming less and less. However, we've seen Rika experience more than a week in advance of the festival, despite Hanyuu being practically gone. And now with Hanyuu completely gone, how is Rika continuing to loop? Has she gained that ability or is this possibly due to a different/second looper?
    • In the case of a second looper, perhaps they are constrained to the 17-22 timespan as featured in the ED?